TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

Unity after elections: Riding a chimera?

The problem is not about religion itself, but lies in how religion is used as an instrument in politics just to serve the interests of egotistical elites.

Michael Herdi Hadylaya (The Jakarta Post)
Premium
Jakarta
Thu, April 13, 2017

Share This Article

Change Size

Unity after elections: Riding a chimera? incumbent gubernatorial candidate Basuki Tjahaja Purnama-Djarot Saiful Hidayat and Gubernatorian Candidate Anies Baswedan-Sandiaga Uno participate during an election debate at the Bidakara Hotel in Jakarta, April 12,2017. The debate was the last official debate Held by DKI Jakarta Election Commision (KPUD DKI) ahead of the runoff in the capital’s gubernatorial election. (JP/Seto Wardhana.)

T

he long-held Indonesian election principles of direct, general, free and confidential seem to have lost their relevance since all people share their thoughts and their preferences on the ballots. Knowing how your colleagues, neighbors or family members vote is a common topic to bring up when you get together.

With confidentiality no longer important in an election, a new problem arises in the Jakarta gubernatorial election. Some groups have threatened to ban religious death rites for people known to have voted for a certain candidate.

Indeed, it is absurd to our ears, but it happened in the world’s socalled third largest democracy.

Read also: When death becomes political: Return of the Greek tragedy

The question is how can the groups know who’s choosing who? If confidentiality is respected, how will those people know other people’s preferences? Someone may say one thing in public and then vote for a completely different candidate in secret.

However bizarre the reality of the race for Jakarta governor and deputy governor is, the use of religion to achieve political goals is not new.

However, intimidating the living by using the dead is neither civilized nor humane. It only shows that the discourse about the state ideology of Pancasila only starts and stops at the first principle, which is belief in an almighty God, and ignores the next pillars of humanity, unity, democracy and social justice.

to Read Full Story

  • Unlimited access to our web and app content
  • e-Post daily digital newspaper
  • No advertisements, no interruptions
  • Privileged access to our events and programs
  • Subscription to our newsletters
or

Purchase access to this article for

We accept

TJP - Visa
TJP - Mastercard
TJP - GoPay

Redirecting you to payment page

Pay per article

Unity after elections: Riding a chimera?

Rp 29,000 / article

1
Create your free account
By proceeding, you consent to the revised Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.
Already have an account?

2
  • Palmerat Barat No. 142-143
  • Central Jakarta
  • DKI Jakarta
  • Indonesia
  • 10270
  • +6283816779933
2
Total Rp 29,000

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.