TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

Water: What next after court decision?

Current agreement is not adequate to meet the water needs of the growing population and a more up-to-date cooperation model needs to be investigated and discussed.

J Scott Younger (The Jakarta Post)
Premium
Jakarta
Mon, October 30, 2017

Share This Article

Change Size

Water: What next after court decision? An aerial photograph of Ciliwung Rver in Bukit Duri, South Jakarta on Oct. 19. (Kompas/Hendra A Setyawan )

T

he judiciary (Constitutional Court), in reversing a previous judgment, has decided that the provision of water in the city of Jakarta under private sector concessions should not be continued and would instead be handed back to PAM Jaya, the public utility company.

PAM Jaya was responsible for the capital’s water supply until the private sector was engaged in February 1998, because the company was non-performing in part due to its huge debts, and because of a very real need for new investment to upgrade and expand the utility service. This was shortly before the end of the Soeharto government.

Critics led by the Public Coalition Against Water Privatization in Jakarta (KMMAJ) have incorrectly said that the scheme failed and caused losses to the state, and further hampered the provision of clean water to low-income households.

The reality is completely different, since the water rate is based on full cost recovery and is unlike most other schemes in Asia, which are unsubsidized. The rate is therefore deemed to cover the entire cost of running the water service, including the operational expenditures of PAM Jaya, the Regulatory Body and the Jakarta administration, as well as amounts payable to cover PAM Jaya’s debts to the Ministry of Finance.

The water rates are set solely by the city government and lowincome families are protected by a very low rate based on a crosssubsidy mechanism, whereby customers of larger key accounts pay up to 14 times more than lowincome customers.

Because the operator receives a flat fee from PAM Jaya for each cubic meter billed and collected, called the water tariff, there is no incentive for the operator to favor connections to wealthier citizens.

In short, the scheme has been a success. It has enabled PAM Jaya to pay off its Rp 1.3 trillion (US$100 million) debt to the government while at the same time, operators have made substantial improvements to the supply system, even though there is still more to be done. However, the current agreement is not adequate to meet the water needs of the growing population and a more up-to-date cooperation model needs to be investigated and discussed.

to Read Full Story

  • Unlimited access to our web and app content
  • e-Post daily digital newspaper
  • No advertisements, no interruptions
  • Privileged access to our events and programs
  • Subscription to our newsletters
or

Purchase access to this article for

We accept

TJP - Visa
TJP - Mastercard
TJP - GoPay

Redirecting you to payment page

Pay per article

Water: What next after court decision?

Rp 29,000 / article

1
Create your free account
By proceeding, you consent to the revised Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.
Already have an account?

2
  • Palmerat Barat No. 142-143
  • Central Jakarta
  • DKI Jakarta
  • Indonesia
  • 10270
  • +6283816779933
2
Total Rp 29,000

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.