TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

Nike sued for sex discrimination by former female employees

Chris Dolmetsch (Bloomberg)
Sat, August 11, 2018

Share This Article

Change Size

Nike sued for sex discrimination by former female employees The Nike 'swoosh' logo is displayed on the outside of the Nike SoHo store, June 15, 2017 in New York City. (Getty Images/AFP /Drew Angerer)

N

ike Inc. was sued for sexual discrimination by former female employees who say women were "devalued and demeaned" by the company, where they are passed over for promotions, paid less than their male counterparts and ignored when they complain.

The lawsuit, filed Thursday in federal court in Portland, Oregon, seeks class-action status and accuses the maker of athletic footwear and apparel of violating the Federal Equal Pay Act and similar state laws. The plaintiffs, former employees Sara Johnston and Kelly Cahill, say the company’s employment policies are hostile to women.

"The ultimate arbiters of these policies or practices are a small group of high-level executives who are majority male," the former employees say in the complaint.

Nike, based in Beaverton, Oregon, said the company "opposes discrimination of any type and has a long-standing commitment to diversity and inclusion."

Read also: Nike, H&M and Burberry join forces for sustainable fashion

"We are committed to competitive pay and benefits for our employees," the company said in a statement. "The vast majority of Nike employees live by our values of dignity and respect for others."

Nike shares have gained 37 percent in the past year. The stock surged in late June, reaching a record high at the time, after North American sales rose for the first time in four quarters, signaling that Nike’s new products are catching on with U.S. shoppers. The company has been promising investors that slowing growth and revenue declines in its largest market were only a short-term trend.

The case is Cahill v. Nike Inc., 18-cv-1477, U.S. District Court, District of Oregon (Portland).

{

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.