Suharto's son awarded damages in Indonesian defamation suit

The Associated Press ,  Jakarta   |  Thu, 02/28/2008 5:49 PM  |  Headlines

An Indonesian court awarded damages of US$552,000 to the son of ex-dictator Suharto after ruling Thursday the state logistics agency defamed him by accusing him of corruption in a civil lawsuit.

The agency claimed Tommy Suharto caused state losses of nearly US$53 million in a 1995 real-estate deal.

"Considering the defendant (Tommy) is a renowned entrepreneur with a national and international reputation, this lawsuit has damaged his reputation, credibility and his business partners in and out of the country," said Judge Esran Basuning.

The ruling will likely anger anti-corruption activists and could raise questions about Indonesia's legal system, which faces its own graft accusations. Critics allege wealthy and powerful defendants routinely bribe judges and prosecutors to get favorable verdicts.

Tommy, who spent five years in jail for ordering the assassination of a Supreme Court judge, was convicted in 2000 of illegally receiving property from the state logistics agency, known as Bulog, in exchange for the construction of a shopping mall.

A higher court later reversed the criminal conviction, but state prosecutors launched civil proceedings against him earlier this year on behalf of Bulog, but that case was dismissed. Tommy in turn submitted a defamation countersuit claiming the agency had damaged his reputation with the civil suit.

Bulog's lawyer Asfifudin, who like many Indonesians goes by a single name, said the state would file an appeal.

Tommy, who was released in October 2006, is the only member of the Suharto family to be convicted of a crime. His family and cronies are believed to have amassed billions of dollars during Suharto's 32-year rule, according to the anti-corruption group Transparency International.

Suharto came to power in a 1965 coup in which hundreds of thousands of opponents were murdered or imprisoned. He died on Jan. 27 after years of ill health, having never faced charges. (*)

Comments (0)  |   Post comment
A  |   A  |   A  |   Mail to a friend  |  Printer Friendly Version |  Digg it!  |  Add to Del.icio.us!  |  Add to Reddit!  |  Stumble it!   |  Share on facebook  

What's On