Letter: Dutch Ambassador's statement on 'Fitna'

Wed, 04/02/2008 1:56 AM  |  Reader's Forum

It will not go unnoticed, after much debate and controversy, that the long anticipated Dutch Parliamentarian Wilders' anti-Islamic film Fitna has finally been released.

His approach concerning Islam and the Koran, as conveyed through this film, has insulted many people--Muslims in particular. The film equates Islam with violence. The Dutch government rejects this interpretation, just like the vast majority of Muslims reject extremism and violence.

The approach taken in the film Fitna contradicts all that the Dutch Government envisages for and aspires to in its society; A society in which people can live together peacefully, showing mutual respect, as well as respect for the fundamental values of the law of state and guaranteeing safety for its citizens whilst maintaining freedom of expression and religion.

The Netherlands is well known for its tradition of respect, tolerance and responsibility. Purposefully offending the feelings and beliefs of groups within this society and beyond is clearly not a part of that tradition.

Freedom to express opinions and showing mutual respect, however, are a part of this tradition. The Dutch government will abide by its tradition and calls upon everyone else to act in a similar spirit.

Freedom of expression is not unrestricted in the sense that in the Netherlands its limits are defined by the law. The Dutch Government is investigating the possibility of Wilders having committed criminal offenses and the Public Prosecution Service will finally make a decision as to whether or not to prosecute.

It is clear the Dutch Government does not stand alone in rejecting this film. An overwhelming majority of Dutch parliamentarians have rejected and criticized it, the main exception being the party of Wilders himself.

The Dutch media have also turned their backs on this film, as has become clear with no Dutch television station stating their willingness to broadcast it so far. As a result, Wilders has found his only other alternative for the distribution of Fitna over the internet.

Finally, the Dutch Government wishes to emphasize expressly, again, it does not share the approach of Wilders. As the Dutch parliamentarian majority, as well as the majority of Dutch society, including its media have also distanced themselves from Wilders, his opinions concerning Islam cannot to be taken as representative of the Netherlands in any way.

The Dutch Government rejects the anti-Islamic approach of this film, and stands open for dialogue whilst calling for freedom of expression and mutual respect. The Netherlands wish to stay in open contact with all those who are in favor of a peaceful dialogue. Only through these means will we be able to cooperate successfully in building towards a society more firmly grounded in mutual understanding and respect, elements which are so precious in our present-day world.

NIKOLAOS VAN DAM
Ambassador of the Netherlands
Jakarta

Comments (2)  |   Post comment
A  |   A  |   A  |   Mail to a friend  |  Printer Friendly Version |  Digg it!  |  Add to Del.icio.us!  |  Add to Reddit!  |  Stumble it!

We can ask people not to hurt our feelings, but at the same time we should ask ourselves if we have not hurt others' feelings/ privacy/ freedom, too. In Indonesia we would be awaken very early morning because of noise from mosques for calling of prayers. Don't you think this is disturbance to others' privacy in having good sleep?? What about Moslem weddings that took place just in the middle of the streets, disturbing the traffics?? Isn't it disturbing others' freedom to have good traffic? Before claiming other people to disturb your privacy/ feelings/ freedom, first ask yourself if you are not doing the same to the others. Don't talk big and loud only because you are a majority!!

Dear Mr. Ambassador,
Thank you for your letter and the formal statement from the Dutch government to reject the film. However, I do hope that your Government's investigation into possible criminal offenses conducted by Mr. Wilders is not just a rhetoric (to begin with, I wonder what criminal case can be linked to Mr. Wilders' action, since you did not specifically mention any issues on that matter). On top of this, I found that your reasoning on freedom of expression to be an outdated and out-of-context cliche, and was merely a means to allow people to pursue their own interest. I agree that people should be given freedom to speak, but shouldn't freedom come with responsibility? To make things worse, Mr. Wilders is, as I understand it, is a noted politician in your country. Shouldn't you and the government expect more responsibility from such person?

Today's Paper

  • Wednesday, July 9, 2008

Weekender

  • COVERPAPER-July.jpg

2008 PON XVII Medal Standings

Last updated: Tuesday, July 8, 2008 4:51 PM

No.ProvinceGoldSilverBronzeTotal
1. East Java 18 12 8 38
2. East Kalimantan 13 13 12 38
3. West Java 11 13 14 38
4. DKI Jakarta 11 11 13 35
5. North Sumatra 6 3 1 10
6. Central Java 4 10 8 22
7. Lampung 4 4 1 9
8. DI Yogyakarta 4 2 2 8
9. South Sulawesi 3 1 0 4
10. South Sumatra 2 2 3 7