Today
Jakarta

Abdul Khalik , The Jakarta Post , Jakarta | Mon, 05/19/2008 11:51 AM | National
Twelve lawmakers currently visiting Argentina for a nine-day "comparative study" tour -- of which seven days are reserved for sightseeing -- have been criticized in light of the current economic climate.
Critics said Sunday the lawmakers were "insensitive" for spending state money on the "costly" trip while Indonesians on lower incomes endured economic hardship.
Effendi Ghazali, a noted political communications expert from the University of Indonesia, joined the chorus of opposition against the trip, calling on House of Representatives members to be "thrifty" as food and fuel prices rise.
"The lawmakers just can't sense people's feelings. They are now facing worsening image problems and lack of trust from the people," he said.
"The trip just made their image worse."
He said the lawmakers could learn about the election system of another country without having to visit that country.
"They could have invited people from the embassy, or invited Argentinian experts to Jakarta. That would have saved a lot of money," Effendi said.
The 12 lawmakers, all members of the House's special team on the presidential election bill, left Jakarta on May 12 this year. Another 16 people joined the entourage, comprising 12 House staff members, two lawmakers' wives, one lawmaker's husband and one staff member's wife.
The lawmakers, from various factions in the House, have claimed they needed to undertake a comparative study on the presidential election system in Argentina.
But the agenda of the visit only allocated two days for the study, while the remaining seven days were used for city tours and sightseeing.
The lawmakers and their staff each received "pocket money" of US$500 per day, excluding hotel fees and expenses for food and tickets.
"That means they are spending billions of rupiah on such a useless trip. I guess the trip was merely an excuse for lawmakers to go picnic abroad," Danang Widyoko from Indonesia Corruption Watch said.
House leaders, however, defended the trip as normal and not violating any regulations.
House Speaker Agung Laksono said it was necessary for the presidential bill team members to visit a country with a better democratic system.
Although it was legal, Danang argued, the trip sent a strong signal that the House failed to care about what most people felt ahead of the government's plan to increase fuel prices.
"It shows the thriftiness movement promoted by the elite was an empty word. The lawmakers should be among the first to display an economical life," he said.
"Cutting unnecessary spending will be highly appreciated by the public in times like this, and can slowly fix the House's image following various scandals that hit scores of its members," he said.
The Reader (not verified) — Wed, 05/21/2008 - 10:38am
Disgusting. Those who authorised this trip should be fired immediately.
The Reader (not verified) — Wed, 05/21/2008 - 6:20am
They oppose the Goverment Plan to cut huge subsidy for Fuel, arguing that on behalf of our People. Actaully NOT. They use the Fuel Price Increase for their individual interest for next general election.
DPR actually never care how much money of our people can be waste, as long as their individual interest fulfilled. That's why we suggest that never trust those people who sitting in DPR.
NEVER treat them as a special elite in this country, since we can NOT see the difference between Cheater, Lier, or even Thief with them. It's really just the disgrace group of people.
The Reader (not verified) — Tue, 05/20/2008 - 2:40pm
Are they brought by truck to the airport??
The Reader (not verified) — Tue, 05/20/2008 - 2:39pm
They earn the highest salaries for doing only a little bit.
Their incentives are skyhigh too but it doesn't help to critize them.
They do exactly what they like and want to do.
The Reader (not verified) — Tue, 05/20/2008 - 6:05am
There is no need to travel that far to see how a successful democratic government. All they need to do is ask the question(s); why is Singapore, Thailand and China are way ahead of Indonesia when it comes to GNP and GDP growth? Why are these countries able to minimize the corruption in their respective countries and able to punish the corrupted government officers? Why is Indonesia having difficulty enforcing the law? This is what we have: Government officers who look after their own interest(s) and pass it on the next generations. It will take time and effort (not popularity) to raise Indonesia to the same standard as the other countries in the world.