Today
Jakarta

Wed, 06/11/2008 10:37 AM | Opinion
The government finally issued a decision on Ahmadiyah, imposing restrictions on the leaders and followers of the minority Islamic sect. A decree issued Monday essentially warned Ahmadiyah against portraying itself as Islamic as long as it recognizes its founder, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, as the last prophet instead of Muhammad, as mainstream Islam believes.
Signed by the home and religious affairs ministers and the attorney general, the ruling falls short of the ban sought by conservative Islamic groups. But the government still threatens Ahmadiyah leaders and followers with legal prosecution if they continue with their religious activities. It does not say what laws they would be accused of violating, but the police would likely resort to blasphemy, tarnishing religion or causing public unrest and disorder.
Leaving the substance (and confusion) of the decree aside for now, what is most disturbing about this episode is the chain of events on Monday that led to this decision.
It started with a massive demonstration in the streets of Jakarta by conservative Islamic groups demanding the government ban Ahmadiyah, a sect that has its origins in India and has been in Indonesia since the 1930s, and now counts hundreds of thousands of people among its followers.
Dozens of demonstration leaders were received by presidential spokesman Andi Mallarangeng, and as captured on television, the "men in white robes" were not so much interested in a dialog as in imposing their views on him, shouting him down every time he tried to open his mouth to explain the government's position.
They left him with an ultimatum: ban Ahmadiyah, or else. Sure enough, a few hours later, the new decree was announced, clearly showing the government going out of its way, to the point of violating the Constitution, to try and appease the protesters.
Have we really sunk so low? Is the way to influence President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono through the power of the mob and the power of intimidation? Can a president who was elected with 62 percent of the vote in 2004 be cowed by a bunch of men in white robes whose claim of representing the people is widely in doubt?
Monday's demonstration came after the June 1 violent attack by the Islam Defenders Front (FPI) on a peaceful rally of people concerned about the loss of freedom of religion in Indonesia if the government banned Ahmadiyah. These radical groups obviously will stop at nothing to get what they want, and, unfortunately, the government just as obviously will succumb to pressure even if it means depriving a minority group of the right to practice their beliefs.
The decree, as carefully as it was worded by the government, still represents an intrusion by the state into the substance of religious teachings. By decrying the sect for portraying itself as Islamic, the government is passing judgment that Ahmadiyah's teachings are wrong. In preventing Ahmadiyah from using the name Islam, the government again is siding with conservative Islam's claim of a monopoly over the religion.
If Indonesia were an Islamic state, this would probably be acceptable. Saudi Arabia and Pakistan both have banned Ahmadiyah. But Indonesia is not an Islamic state, at least not the last time we checked. This is still by our reckoning a state in which freedom of religion is guaranteed by the Constitution and where the state is expected to protect all citizens in practicing their beliefs.
One can also forcibly argue that preventing people from practicing their beliefs itself contravenes the Islamic principle that "there shall be no coercion in matters of faith".
The style of the decree was characteristic of President Yudhoyono: vague and subject to multiple interpretations. Admittedly the President has bought himself time to momentarily calm the tension. But sooner or later, the government has to decide clearly where it stands on the question of freedom of religion.
And most importantly, after this episode, President Yudhoyono has to come out and show that he, and not the mob, is still in charge of the country.
Dismayed (not verified) — Sat, 06/14/2008 - 8:21am
I was born and grew up in a non muslim South East Asian country. As minority muslims we faced discrimation and intimidation; the main reason I moved to Indonesia. Now I am appalled that my fellow muslims in Indonesia are exercising the very practice I thought only the babarians and uneducated are capable of. Worse, the government endorsed it!
Indonesia Tulen (not verified) — Fri, 06/13/2008 - 4:33pm
Your editorial is simply sharp and satirically funny. Great piece of write-up. I admire your consistency in advocating for religious freedom and pluralism in this country. Keep up the good work!
Tahir Iqbal (not verified) — Fri, 06/13/2008 - 10:32am
INDONESIA FINALLY ISSUES DECREE OF "STATE SPONSORED" TERRORISM"!
The Decree against Ahmadiyya Community is in its essence a DECREE of State Sponsored Terrorism in the name of Service to Islam. The POWER HUNGRY politicians in connivance with the so-called Ulema (who are traders of violence)have actually signed a warrant of their own Political Death AND an end of peace of their own country.
TAHIR IQBAL
CHICAGO, IL
USA
MUBARAK (not verified) — Fri, 06/13/2008 - 10:16am
I hope your editorial will make the rulers to open their eyes and at the same time i request the people of indonesia,particularly those who were misguided by the mob leaders to read the books written by the ahmadiya jamaat and discuss,ask about their doubts
with the community members,please dont believe the false propaganda.May Allah show the right path to the people of the great nation Indonesia.
Bruce (not verified) — Fri, 06/13/2008 - 10:10am
Indonesia is a developing democracy with all the pains associated with it. I can understand the difficulties of the transition they are facing. I am sure every country and every people, including mine, USA have faced similar circumstances or worse at some time.
I know the good people of Indonesia will in time work this out in their own way. I pray it is done peacefully and with respect to the rights of all people to worship as they choose. Do all you can to continue the dialog and foster progress to greater and fuller freedom for all the Indonesian people.
Disgusted (not verified) — Thu, 06/12/2008 - 9:12am
This is a terrible and dangerous precedent set by the Indonesian government. Interfering with the Ahmadiyahs religious freedom to appease a small group of extremists is just the beginning of a slippery slope. Now that FPI and other extremists know they can get whatever they want by paying mobs to protests and beating women and children, who will they target next? Other minority Muslim sects? Christians? How long until they start demanding strict sharia totalitarianism?
Those of you who defend this decision are so pathetic. If you know your version of Islam is correct, then what does it matter what others do or say? Only if your faith is weak would you feel threatened by those who believe differently. This should be an internal matter for Muslims to deal with themselves, why do you need the government to intervene? Do you fear Ahmadiyah's message so much?
The only way SBY and the government will understand how stupid their decision was is if they are shamed and ridiculed for being so weak and easily manipulated. Already the western media is picking up this story to show how Indonesia is still a backwards country with a weak government. All those who hope to one day have a strong enlightened government should never let SBY forget how a group of thugs made him dance like a puppet and look like a fool.
Ning (not verified) — Thu, 06/12/2008 - 6:52am
Dear editor,
do you think that freedom has no limit at all?
Lets make an analogy. Will you allow anyone enter your house, than this new comer make a house within your house, and then claim that your house and his house inside it is his? Will you allow it to happen based on freedom that anyone can build a house anywhere they want to?
Thats how Ahmadiyah in Islam. Thats why muslims --hardliners and non hardliners alike-- try to expel Ahmadiyah from the house of Islam, and let them build any religion outside Islam. Only some hypocrits who admit as muslims but do not know the essential doctrine of their own religion who think that Ahmadiyah should be lkeft alone in Islam.
Its a mistake if you think only a handful 'hardliners' who fight for this. Its a problem for muslims worldwide, be it in an Islamic state or not.
Is not there any muslim left in the rank of editors of the Jakarta Post?
Yoav (not verified) — Wed, 06/11/2008 - 7:08pm
if the Ahmadiyah group isnt part of islam then by the same principle so are most of the shia. your media is impressive in its regard for freedom and human rights. carry on the good work and good luck from israel
.
Mohammad Hafiz (not verified) — Wed, 06/11/2008 - 3:47pm
Dear The Jakarta Post editorial,
There is no border for religion. Islamic state or not, all Moslem's have to follow their rules. Even when a Moslem's living among the Israel's.
Indonesia is a state in which freedom of religion is guaranteed by the Constitution and where the state is expected to protect all citizens in practicing their beliefs. It's mean that their citizen is free to choose the beliefs their want, and the government will guarantee them to be able to do what their beliefs told them to do.
Ahmadiyah's claimed them self as a Moslem's. But Ahmadiyah's recognizes its founder Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as the last prophet instead of Muhammad SAW. It's mean that they have braking the main rules in Islam. There for MUI (the highest Moslem's non government institution) ban Ahmadiyah for saying them self as a Moslem's. So in order to protect Moslem's, Government ban Ahmadiyah's too.
If you are asking Government to protect Ahmadiyah's, then Ahmadiyah's have to remove their Moslem's attribute in their believes first. So the government will see them as a new believes that different form Moslem's. Then the Government will definitely protect them in practicing their beliefs.
Dear The Jakarta Post editorial,
Your quote about Islamic principle that "there shall be no coercion in matters of faith" wasn't fit in Ahmadiyah's case. Because this Islamic principle, means that Moslem's won't push or force a person to become a Moslem's. So if there is OTHER religion who believes that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as the last prophet, the Moslem's won't bother, but only for OTHER religion. For Moslem's, the principle is: "The Right Path has become distinct from the wrong path!" (QS:2 Ayat:256).
Regards,
Mohammad Hafiz