Today
Jakarta

Tifa Asrianti , The Jakarta Post , Jakarta | Mon, 09/15/2008 10:14 AM | City
In drafting guidelines for occupancy levels of low-cost apartments, an expert says the city administration needs to conduct a complete study first because a higher floor ratio could overcrowd the city.
Ahmad Djuhara, chairman of the Jakarta chapter of the Association of Indonesian Architects, said Sunday a transparent and thorough study would allow city dwellers to see how crowded these housing areas could become.
Any development plan automatically attracts people to come to live in an area, he said, so this research would be used to allow the administration to estimate ideal population density levels (before they go ahead with a project).
"It's alright to build apartments with a floor area ratio (FAR) of six, as long as the population density level is maintained at one person for every 2.5 square meters, or 4,000 persons per square kilometer," he said.
The city administration and related stakeholders -- including the Indonesian Developers Association (REI), the Public Housing Ministry and the Public Works Agency -- plan to issue technical guidelines within the next two weeks, to increase the FAR for low-cost apartments from four to six, following a request from developers for an amendment.
"We wanted an FAR of six because a feasibility study conducted by the Public Works Agency in 2007 showed that an FAR of six would allow us to sell units for Rp 144 million (US$15,151).
"If developers don't want to build with an FAR of six that's their decision, but don't limit us with an FAR of three or four," REI chairman Teguh Satria said.
The ratio and building coverage standards determine the number of floors that developers were allowed to be build on land, making buildings structurally and socio-economically viable.
To calculate the maximum number of floors allowed, developers must multiply the size of the block of land by the FAR and then divide by the building coverage factor.
For example, a one-hectare block with an FAR of six and building coverage of 30 percent (3,000 square meters) could have up to 20 floors.
Deputy Governor Prijanto said previously that the 2007 gubernatorial decree on low-cost apartments stipulates that changing the ratio was possible, as long as it fulfills environmental and technical guidelines.
"We'll discuss the requirements for the ratio change. The developers, for example, should provide public facilities that match residents' needs, such as parking lots and pre-schools," he said.
Each apartment would have different facilities because each had its own specific needs, he said.
Ahmad said low-cost apartment developers needed not only to consider the FAR, but also public facilities such as transportation.
"Low-cost apartments should be comfortable and integrated with other facilities so residents can reach amenities -- and be within walking distance of workplaces, schools and markets," he said.
Ahmad said apartments downtown should have a higher FAR than those on the periphery because this would curb the city's sprawl and allow inhabitants to live closer to their workplaces.
"I have yet to see proof that an FAR of six can be comfortable for a residential building. But it's a challenge for architects to design a compact and comfortable building," he said.
Ahmad said in designing low-cost apartments the heterogeneity of inhabitants also needed to be considered. In Singapore, he said, an apartment building must have an equal composition of Chinese, Indian and ethnic Malay residents.
Rodney Jensen (not verified) — Fri, 09/19/2008 - 5:42pm
FAR is a crude instrument for planning control and encourages developers to go for the maximum without proper consideration of impact.
Urban design should be more concerned about the living conditions of future users and the physical impact of building in the public domain. These include overshadowing, solar glare from glazing, wind effects, the overall design in relation to the context, and the conservation of cultural heritage.
To the visitor to Jakarta, it is evident that the pursuit of ever-larger residential and commercial buildings has been at the expense of such urban design considerations.
Low cost housing on the one hand justifies some dispensation from the normal density cap on planning controls but should not be creating the ghettos of the future.
In many parts of Europe and the US there are examples of high-rise flats which because of the poor/substandard planning and design are now recognized as a significant contributor to social problems.
In some cities high-rise flats of the 60s are being demolished in favor of low-rise high coverage town houses. In general this form of housing is far more likely to engender the lifestyle qualities that everybody wants to enjoy -- whether or not they are poor.
Rodney Jensen (not verified) — Wed, 09/17/2008 - 6:51pm
Very Interesting.
A 6:1 FAR is very high indeed - and runs the risk of slum conditions unless extremely well designed and managed.
In the article, the definition given for FAR:
("To calculate the maximum number of floors allowed, developers must multiply the size of the block of land by the FAR and then divide by the building coverage factor") is not actually correct since FAR = total floor area divided by the site area or it does in every country I have worked in!
For example 6:1 FAR is equivalent to a whole of site development (ie 100% coverage) of six storeys. Complicating the matter further is the fact that usually parking area is not included in the calculation (but this would depend on the local definition) so you might find that a 6:1 FAR could lead to a building of 8 or more storeys at full coverage, or perhaps 16 storeys at 50% coverage.
"Coverage", incidentally, means the footprint of the building divided by the site area usually expressed as a percentage.
It would make your article even more interesting to go out and photograph a couple of housing developments at this density to show how dense they actually are.
Teguh utomo atmoko (not verified) — Tue, 09/16/2008 - 1:33pm
If the land price today is reflected by the minimum FAR of 6 so the project in feasible, or can make money, how big is FAR for five years from now when the price of land two times from today? Are you still go for it? Are you gonna accomodate people in the 1000 apartment towers or rats? Those involve it this 6 FAR for apartments are inhumane!!!
How to afford one (not verified) — Mon, 09/15/2008 - 8:17pm
Please remember "Nothing come cheap and yet comfortable". Who is going to pay, is there any financial subsidy ???
You have the plan, you have the financial fund to build but ultimately the poor still could not afford it then what ?