Other Publications
Editorial: Bike lanes, then what?
Sat, 10/25/2008 1:05 PM | Opinion
Some readers might have said, "What on earth is this?" or "Ooh, look, another pet project!" when they read the report on The Jakarta Post's City page on Tuesday about the Jakarta authorities' plan to develop integrated pedestrian and bicycle lanes in the city.
Let's be clear on one thing first. People are unlikely to make such negative comments because they do not agree with the provision of better paths for Jakarta's pedestrians, who number in the millions, and cyclists, of whom there are about 10,000. And of course the bicycle itself is a healthy choice with the twin advantages of reducing pollution and providing good exercise for cyclists.
The plan itself is very constructive. As pointed out by well-known landscape architect Nirwono Jogo -- in his capacity as consultant to the City Park Agency -- the project will be simple and cheap, because all that is needed is to mark lanes with signs indicating they are for bikes and pedestrians. We do support the plan.
For years, if not for decades, Jakarta's governors have been promising to provide better sidewalks, and nearly all of them have promised to follow Singapore's Orchard Road as a model for Jakarta streets. In Central Jakarta there are more and more walkways, but this city is greater than this municipality alone.
The administration also has provided facilities more suitable for those with disabilities, especially wheelchair users, for instance by providing special lanes on some crossings on Jalan Thamrin and on Jalan Merdeka Barat in Central Jakarta. But those who need these lanes often have awful experiences on them because so many motorists ignore the traffic lights even when they can see handicapped people crossing the road legally.
And to be fair, we can't blame just the city administration for the failure to provide safe paths for pedestrians. Many public areas end up achieving nothing because street vendors take up the space, or motorists commandeer the space for themselves. The willingness of Jakarta residents to take responsibility for maintaining public facilities is low. Selfishness is evident nearly everywhere.
It is a fairly safe bet that few people will oppose Jakarta Governor Fauzi Bowo's statement that he will provide public infrastructure for bicycles only when there were one million bikes in the city. The governor is being honest in disclosing his reluctance to spend time and money to protect the 10,000-odd cyclists when the city is lagging behind on protecting millions of Jakartans from the dangers posed by the coming rainy season.
Many Jakartans respond to the proposal for walkways and bike lanes with some cynicism because they are tired of city officials who are very creative in planning and developing "noble" infrastructure projects that are quickly abandoned in favor of another pet project.
As architect Nirwono himself acknowledged, as quoted by this newspaper,"All we need is the administration's political will, which currently is lacking."
Look at the busway facilities. The plan is perfect, and of course thousands of commuters are helped by the busway network everyday. The question is why it is taking so long to finish the project, when there are not even any delicate problems like land appropriation, for instance.
But then again, Governor Fauzi Bowo is in a difficult position in facing the City Council. The city councilors often behave as if their only mission is to block the governor's programs. The councilors, many perceived by the public as corrupt, often have no shame in using the "public interest" as their pretext in advancing their own interests to enrich themselves or their parties.
Support the walkways and bike lanes issue. The plan deserves our whole-hearted support. It is unlikely there is anyone in Jakarta who can claim to never need the walkways. We do support every effort to create better living conditions for residents of this city.
We also need to remind the city officials of their obligation to stick to the masterplan and to implement government projects consistently.
But with the rainy season about to arrive, and little evidence to reassure us the government is making the best preparations to minimize flooding, how can we be convinced that the integrated pedestrian and bicycle lanes will not become just another pet project?
What's On
- Franchise & Business Concept
11/13/2009 11/15/2009 Jakarta Convention Center - Indonesia Furniture Fair
11/14/2009 11/22/2009 Jakarta Convention Center - Indonesia Maternity & Baby Expo 2009
11/20/2009 11/22/2009 Jakarta Convention Center
- Festival of India
10/29/2009 12/15/2009 Balai Kartini & Umar Ismail Hall, Jakarta
- Best Dutch Books Designs
10/08/2009 11/12/2009 Erasmus Huis, Jl. H.R. Rasuna Said Kav S-3, Kuningan, South Jakarta (Tel. 5241069) - Power of the Shape. Sculpture exhibition by Dolorosa Sinaga
10/29/2009 11/15/2009 Kendra Gallery of Contemporary Art, Bali Until Nov. 15 Jl. Drupadi No.88B, Basangkasa Seminyak, Bali - The Erased Time: Solo exhibition by FX Harsono
11/01/2009 11/14/2009 Galeri Nasional Indonesia, Central Jakarta
Diah (not verified) — Tue, 11/04/2008 - 4:10pm
First my apology for poor English, but I think PemProv DKI Jakarta should learn from the previous public transport policies. As mentioned in the article…. “Look at the busway facilities. The plan is perfect, and of course thousands of commuters are helped by the busway network everyday. The question is why it is taking so long to finish the project………….”
It is not the length of the project, the basic question is: what the main purpose of busway facilities? Is it to reduce the traffic in Jakarta by hoping that commuters can use it or are there any purposes? If the supporting facilities (e.g. car/motorcycles/bike parking area in suburb areas – feeder vehicles options – numbers of busway routes – numbers of the busway itself) are not in the plan, then the busway facilities still isn’t effective.
Even the famous 3-in-1 policy, it just doesn’t work. Nowadays car owners are able to pay cheaply for a ‘joki’. Now you figure the numbers if there are 10,000 car owners use these ‘joki’ every morning/afternoon then I guarantee you’ll find traffic jam in protocol streets. Can you, again, imagine that these cars go home to suburb areas - one car for one person?
Last, a walkways and bike lanes issue policy is the same as these policies. PemProv DKI should ask: What is the basic purpose of providing it? Is it to reduce traffic or to create better living conditions for this city?
The truth is I still believe in good governance decision so I would suggest to PemProv DKI to do a transparent comprehend public survey first before implementing it.
Robby Kaware (not verified) — Mon, 10/27/2008 - 1:43pm
Unlike people in other countries like Spore, Netherlands, etc., we Indonesians, are forced to drive our private cars to get around safely and conveniently. This is ridiculous because car price in Indonesia is among the most expensive in Asia while our wages are amongst the lowest.
Public transports ? Only for those majority people who have no options, i.e., can not afford to buy cars.
Walkways and bike lanes ? Forget it !
Jakarta barely has such infrastructures.
As a German graduate architect himself, Fauzi Bowo are supposed to know better on how to create a civilized city for human beings like in most european countries.
Human beings require sidewalks which is safe, sufficiently wide, clean, comfortable and most importantly, entertaining. Bike lanes are also required to complement with public bus and trains without which there would be a missing link. I strongly believe our people will love these public facilities and maintain them properly.
Open spaces like public parks are also required where people can meet neighbours like people in rural areas do.
Example, Surabaya during 1950s and 1960s. There were sidewalks in most part of the city. There were also electric tram.
Those infrastructures are simple, easy to built and cheap.
Hence, pak Fauzi Bowo shall have every reasons to start thinking about it......
Schmerly (not verified) — Mon, 10/27/2008 - 1:07pm
Bike lanes? yet another hair brained scheme that won’t last five minutes, still while it lasts it’ll be another nice little earner for the corrupt to make money enforcing it, the money would be better spent on flood control and rubbish collection, but then perhaps there’s no money to be made out of flood control or rubbish collection, or is there?
setyawan (not verified) — Sat, 10/25/2008 - 10:03pm
Good for Us , but how about reducing the flood of Jakarta for the next therm because it was been twice that we got flood in Jakarta for last two years . Is there any policy to do this reducing flood program ?