Editorial: Tourism law accomplishes little

Fri, 12/26/2008 11:21 AM  |  Opinion

We don't see how the new tourism law which was passed by the House of Representatives last week will contribute to further developing Indonesia into a major destination for global tourists.

Simply speaking, the new legislation fails to provide new, strong building blocks for strengthening the main pillars of the travel and tourism industry -- the regulatory and physical infrastructure, hygiene and health and other support services.

The law does specifically stipulate the imperative need for strategic coordination of policies and activities among the various sectors related to travel and tourism such as customs, immigration, quarantine, security and order, physical infrastructure, health and promotional activities.

But it does not elaborate on how this policy coordination will be institutionalized and managed on a day-to-day basis, only saying that the coordination will be led by the President and the Vice President and the technical details will be formulated in a presidential decree.

This deficiency is quite damaging because lack of coordination either of policies or of activities in tourism-related sectors has become one of the biggest barriers to wooing foreign tourists to Indonesia.

The latest example is how the well-intentioned policy of certifying imported food and beverages -- which was designed to protect the interests of consumers -- became bogged down in bureaucratic inertia, causing supply disruption at the expense of foreign visitors and foreign residents.

The visa policy also often does not consider the target countries of our tourist promotional programs.

The new law instead institutionalizes the coordination of tourism promotion activities through the establishment of a private-sector (independent) tourism promotion agency by tourism-related businesspeople which will be in charge of coordinating promotional programs within the country and overseas. The agency will be run by a governing board in charge of promotional policy making and a management board in charge of the daily execution of promotional activities.

Unfortunately, this new agency will have to raise by itself the bulk of its operating funds, a major deficiency that will forever bar it from developing into a powerful agency such as the Tourism Authority of Thailand or the Singapore Tourism Promotion Board.

The law also allows provincial and regency administrations to set up regional tourism promotion agencies. However, without clear-cut statutory mandates and funding, their effectiveness will be highly questionable.

Moreover, the government seems unaware that promotion touches only the end of the long chain of activities required to produce the goods and services needed by tourists.

Of most importance is the quality of the end-product or the image of Indonesia as a tourist destination. But this quality or image is determined, not by promotional activities, but primarily and largely by how efficient, reliable and good are our regulatory and physical infrastructures (customs, visa, health, transportation, hotels and other support services).

The legislation does not elaborate either on how the Culture and Tourism Ministry will be related to the national tourism promotion agency and regional tourism promotional agencies.

Therefore, we don't expect much from the tourism law in the way of strengthening the regulatory and physical infrastructure of our tourism industry.

This is quite unfortunate because the volume of international tourism within the next two years is estimated to decrease due to the global economic downturn and the competition for tourist dollars will become much keener.

Fast-growing, emerging economies such as Brazil, Russia, India, China, Mexico and South Korea have increasingly become major sources of newly affluent travelers. Last year, for example, the Russians made a total of 34.3 million trips abroad and the Chinese 47 million, according to the World Tourism and Travel Council.

We greatly doubt whether we have designed promotional programs specifically to woo tourists from these emerging economies.

It is needless to re-emphasize the multiplier effect and labor-intensive nature of tourism-related businesses, in sectors such as hotels, restaurants, transportation and handicrafts -- the very kind of businesses needed to absorb the huge pool of job seekers.

Indonesia, though quite rich in culture, natural attractions and historical heritage, will thus remain among the least favorite destination areas in the ASEAN region. Tourist arrivals for the first ten months of this year totaled only 5.09 million, already larger than the 5.05 million in all of 2007, but still far below the target of 7 million set for this year. This figure is even more miserable compared to the average annual arrivals in Singapore, Thailand and Malaysia which exceed 12 million.

Comments (4)  |   Post comment
A  |   A  |   A  |   Mail to a friend  |  Printer Friendly Version |  Digg it!  |  Add to Del.icio.us!  |  Add to Reddit!  |  Stumble it!   |  Share on facebook  

To attract more tourist, it is necessary that highly professional strategists from Switzerland, Austria and Germany should be hired by the Ministry of Tourism.

Enlish and American are not experts in matter of tourism at all. Their countries are poor in attracting new tourists.

The most innovative are from Switzerland, Austria and Switzerland, with the best idea to attract not only wealthy tourists, but also young tourists with a good purchase power.

We have had established several successful concepts, as Central Europe is hosting the most demanding tourists.

It is starting from TV campaigns to events which are truly attracting new tourists !

The points you mention should normally be self-evident to anybody with half a brain.

Unfortunately for Indonesia, there seems to be a flow of ridiculous and poorly considered decrees, bills and new "laws" lately. I can't think of even one that will benefit anybody! So what's really going on here?

If the originators want to plunge this country into some kind of regional laughing stock, they're succeeding. If they seriously believe they're doing something positive for their own population, I believe they're getting it badly wrong.

So be it. Don't cry for me, Indonesia.
Shoot yourself in the other foot.

The points you mention should normally be self-evident to anybody with half a brain.

Unfortunately for Indonesia, there seems to be a flow of ridiculous and poorly considered decrees, bills and new "laws" lately. I can't think of even one that will benefit anybody! So what's really going on here?

If the originators want to plunge this country into some kind of regional laughing stock, they're succeeding. If they seriously believe they're doing something positive for their own population, I believe they're getting it badly wrong.

So be it. Don't cry for me, Indonesia.
Shoot yourself in your other foot.

"This deficiency is quite damaging because lack of coordination either of policies or of activities in tourism-related sectors has become one of the biggest barriers to wooing foreign tourists to Indonesia."

The others being;
1) Lack of booze because of de facto Islamic law
2) The so called "anti-pornography" law, a de facto Sharia (Islamic) law.
3) Massive human rights abuses by the RI
4) Corruption in Indonesia knowing no bounds, with every foreigner a target.
5) Destruction of churches and murders of Christians by Islamic mobs clearly tolerated and perhaps supported by the authorities.
6) Leaner jail sentences and less chance of prosecution if you are Muslim.
7) Appalling health conditions and terrible diseases made worse by the fact foreigners know Jakarta does not effectively combat these problems but openly lies and tries to cover them up in the name of business.
8) A visa on arrival fee
9) Tsunami risk made worse by falsehoods the early warning system would actually provide an early warning for the beaches of Indonesia, with the fault line too close for warnings except for further afield.
10) Appalling value for money. Bali's so called top luxury hotels being more expensive and serving bland food in comparison with destinations like Thailand, when in fact they should be less expensive due to the fact operating costs are lower in Indonesia, hmmmmm.

The bulk of tourism to Indonesia has become cheap package deal tourism from SE Asia and Australasia, where taxes are dodged, service fees used to compensate for lost profit, corners cut on food and service, making Indonesia even less of a first choice destination for more lucrative independent travelers as they get the dross that has become standard.

What's On