Facebook nudity policy draws nursing moms' ire

Jessica Mintz ,  The Associated Press   |  Sun, 01/04/2009 11:24 AM  |  Sci-Tech

Web-savvy moms who breast-feed are irate that social networking sites like Facebook and MySpace restrict photos of nursing babies. The disputes reveal how the sites' community policing techniques sometimes struggle to keep up with the booming number and diversity of their members.

Kelli Roman shows her breastfeeding her daughter Ivy. (AP/Kelli Roman)Kelli Roman shows her breastfeeding her daughter Ivy. (AP/Kelli Roman)

Facebook began as a site just for college kids, but now it is an online home for 140 million people from all over the world. Among the new faces of Facebook are women like Kelli Roman, 23, who last year posted a photo of herself nursing one of her two children.

One day, she logged on to find the photo missing. When she pressed Facebook for an explanation, she got form e-mails in return.

Facebook bars people from uploading anything "obscene, pornographic or sexually explicit" — a policy that translates into a ban on pictures depicting certain amounts of exposed flesh.

Roman responded by starting a Facebook group called "Hey, Facebook, breastfeeding is not obscene!"

"There is nothing about bottle-feeding a child that has to be discreet," said Roman, who lives in Fallbrook, Calif., in an interview. "With breast-feeding, it should be the exact same way."

Today the group — part petition, part message board, part photo-sharing hub — has more than 97,600 members.

One of them, Stephanie Muir of Ottawa, was new to Facebook when she stumbled across the group last year. Muir, a mother of five, does volunteer work related to public health and breast-feeding and said the issue is important to her.

"I think it's time we all get over this notion that women's breasts are dangerous and harmful for children to see," she said. So she organized a Facebook protest last weekend against the site's policies, which she believes are arbitrarily enforced and discriminate against women.

Muir said more than 11,000 people participated in the group's "virtual nurse-in" by swapping out their regular profile pictures on Facebook and uploading ones depicting breast-feeding.

At Facebook's headquarters in Palo Alto, Calif., 23-year-old mom Heather Farley, who was visiting from her home in Provo, Utah, led a real-world nurse-in to complement the online event. About 10 women showed up to breast-feed their babies outside the front door, drawing attention from local media if not Facebook employees, who were scarce on that Saturday after Christmas.

A member for almost four years, Farley has nearly 400 friends on Facebook, a network she'd be hard-pressed to replicate if she moved to a smaller site with more lenient photo policies. She uses Facebook more than e-mail to stay in touch with far-flung high school and college friends. She especially likes to check out pictures of their babies and share photos of hers. But with a 9-month-old, "it's almost hard to get a picture of me not nursing," she said.

This fall, Farley changed her profile photo to one that showed her breast-feeding. Someone probably objected, because Facebook deleted it. It, like MySpace, generally relies on members to point out when others break the rules.

Facebook spokesman Barry Schnitt said the company's guidelines regarding exposed flesh allow most breast-feeding photos. However, Facebook draws the line at a visible nipple or areola, he said. Facebook also nixes pictures showing the gluteal cleft.

Facebook doesn't generally go looking for nudity, but it does respond quickly when someone on the site flags another person's photo as inappropriate. Schnitt said the policies were instituted years ago, when Facebook was much smaller, but they reflect common practices on mainstream Web sites.

"We decided nudity was something we didn't want on the site. It doesn't matter the context. We would agree that there are absolutely many contexts for nudity where it is not obscene," Schnitt said, but emphasized that Facebook can't practically convene a panel to decide on a case-by-case basis.

John Palfrey, a Harvard Law School professor who specializes in Internet issues, called Facebook a victim of its own success.

"As we wrap more and more of our lives into a single environment on the Web, the feeling that civil liberties ought to be protected there continues to grow," Palfrey said.

But it's really just that — a feeling. Online hangouts might simulate a public place, but they're still private Web sites where the company is king, not the Constitution or the myriad state laws that apply to breast-feeding outside the home.

News Corp.-owned MySpace, which prohibits nudity, also has sparked online protests over photos taken down of breast-feeding mothers. A company spokeswoman did not return messages seeking comment.

One contrast is LiveJournal, a popular blogging network, which made an exception for nursing in its no-nudity policy. The rule came in response to feedback from users and an advisory board comprised of Internet scholars.

While Schnitt said Facebook's policies predate a recent push by law enforcement agencies to better protect children from online predators, the whole field of Web hangouts may be skittish about anything that might expose kids to nudity, said Lee Tien, a senior staff attorney at the free-speech watchdog group Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Facebook already curtails the activities of some members based on age and the networks they belong to. For example, adults can't look at profiles of kids under the age of 18, even if they're members of the same regional network.

Palfrey suggests a middle ground might emerge, in which networking sites like Facebook can better satisfy diverse constituencies without creating strife. That will require honing the technology to make it more certain that only people within specific networks and groups could see, say, a breast-feeding photo, while keeping children from seeing nudity.

Palfrey describes the goal as making "a site that is good for everyone, or good for the largest number of people, rather than the fewest."

Comments (26)  |   Post comment
A  |   A  |   A  |   Mail to a friend  |  Printer Friendly Version |  Digg it!  |  Add to Del.icio.us!  |  Add to Reddit!  |  Stumble it!   |  Share on facebook  

Here is the deal... Teen leaves high school does not finish or pursue formal education, meets a guy, gets preggy and then this metamorphosis.

Super MOM! I am serious, this transition becomes almost a crutch to them, the excuse to blow up and gain 75 lbs and start running up the credit cards way beyond their means...and watching daytime TV. These new moms soon depart from their former BFF's (if they are single or still even if they are physically fit) and only "bond" with other young Moms who share the same traits, weight problems and history... It's almost compensating for the trama of losing that vollyball body they took for granted.

Any mom who thinks it is appropriate to breast feed in public - much less on any internet forum, is a Super MOM...hear her ROAR!

Facebook is such a waste of time. I never understand why people want to spend much of their time using this kind of website.

What is the reason that a mother feels that it is necessary to post a photo of her breast feeding? Why can't you just post a photo of you and your baby smiling?

I agree with facebook , all of pornography pictures must be restricted.

Why do women want to show pictures of themselves breast feeding anyway?? I asked several girls none said they would or could answer why anyone would want to share that.

Get over it! We are mammals, class Mammalia. The very descriptor relates to the fact that we, or half of us anyway, possess mammary glands. It is how we feed, or should feed, our babies. The nursing event causes very important and strong emotional bonding between the mother and baby, it also provides the very best nourishment and immunity possible for the baby. This event should be celebrated as an indication that we have a healthy, normal, happy society. Sickos who think that this is an immoral act should go buy some bisphenol laden polycarbonate plastic baby bottles, fill them with industrial corn syrup, sugar, soy protein cornstarch carrageenan, safflower oil etc. (formula) find a dark place alone and suck it up!

Grant & Webber--

Your comments portray the both of you as young, naive, and out of touch with the reality of things. First, it's not even about woman's rights. Secondly, breast feeding is natural and should not be looked down upon. We should promote it for the many benefits it provides over any concoction some manufacturing plant on the other side of the world can make...
Breast Milk is the Best Milk
Lastly, feminism will only disappear when men like you stop complaining about woman getting rights!

After I think about it Grant and Webber, the two of you might want to meet up and get some help. Counseling First. Psychologist Second. Psychiatrist Third. Judging by your comments, the two of you probably have self-esteem issues, and one of you might be on the spectrum of Aspergers.

Yeah for breastfeeding! Anyone who thinks there's something dirty about it is not evolved. Oh well, you can go ahead and feed your babies tainted formula or formula lacking proper nutrition. Put your trust in corporations.

Guess what. Bottle feeding IS different than breast feeding, because bottle feeding doesn't involve exposing parts of the female body that are considered to be private and indecent to openly display. Yes, breastfeeding is more natural than bottlefeeding.

Please stop this nonsense. If you feel like someone needs to see pictures of you breastfeeding your kid, show them some. Don't broadcast it for unsuspecting people to see.

Anyone could type 'breast' in google search and find 'breasts'.

Chicken, Turkey, Goose and perhaps human.

WORRY ABOUT the economy instead

;)

What's On