TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

The ever-raging battle over the death penalty

Last month, President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono confirmed that two drug convicts on death row had been granted clemency — which led to an uproar, as he had pledged in 2006 that drug convicts did not deserve clemency

The Jakarta Post
Mon, November 19, 2012

Share This Article

Change Size

The ever-raging battle over the death penalty

L

em>Last month, President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono confirmed that two drug convicts on death row had been granted clemency — which led to an uproar, as he had pledged in 2006 that drug convicts did not deserve clemency. Meanwhile, the state’s recognition of capital punishment has been a primary constraint in lobbying efforts for the 197 Indonesian nationals currently on death row in various countries. The Jakarta Post’s Nani Afrida reports on the controversy.

Joshua Kevin Deegan, 22, was among the young Australian soccer players killed in the 2002 Bali bombings. Australians called for the bombers’ heads, though their courts had abolished the death penalty decades ago. However, Joshua’s father, a barrister, called for a life sentence to “dis-empower” the criminals, instead of setting them up as martyrs.

“I see that no good will come from their execution. I see only harm. The cycle of distrust, bordering on hatred, between Muslims and Christians spins at an ever increasing rate,” Brian Deegan wrote in a 2006 letter to authorities.

“There are many more men and women ready, willing and able to replace those that have been condemned. These men will be seen as martyrs and so the cycle will continue.

“I have three younger children and I wish for them to enjoy all the fruits of life, free of hatred, free of ignorance, free from bitterness and free from fear,” said the letter as reprinted on the website of Amnesty International.

Mahendradatta, a lawyer for suspected terrorists, says the death sentence should remain the last resort for cases like corruption and drug abuse.

However, he says that it is not an effective deterrent for terrorists, as they seek martyrdom and divine rewards, as in the case of the executed Bali bombers.

Imam Samudra, Amrozi and Mukhlas never sought clemency from the President once their appeals were rejected by the Supreme Court. They even reportedly refused to be blindfolded in front of the
firing squad.

As with other nations, Indonesia is divided over capital punishment, though many support the death penalty, in part because Islam, the predominant religion in the country, recognizes capital punishment.

As of 2011, the Law and Human Rights Ministry’s director general of correctional facilities listed 115 convicts on death row, mostly for drug convictions.

Parents who have watched their children die because of drugs, or at the hand of suicide bombers, are among those who demand that the people responsible are given the death penalty.

Aidar Iskandar, a mother, said that she lost her son because of drugs.

“I wish all drug dealers would receive the death penalty. The decision [to keep them alive] hurts my feelings,” she said.

“I think Indonesia still needs this punishment, because criminals or drug dealers will not be deterred by a life sentence,” student Dedi Supardi said.

Human rights activists stand against the death sentence, saying the government has no right to take somebody’s life.

“Our laws are not perfect and sometimes the convict has undergone severe torture during interrogation. We must avoid punishing anyone who is innocent,” said Taufik Basari, a lawyer who is against capital punishment.

One famous case of the wrongful conviction of innocent people is that of Sengkon and Karta. The men were sentenced to seven and 12 years respectively for murdering Sulaiman and Siti Hayadi in Bojongsari village, Bekasi in 1974.

Sengkon and Karta spent behind bars for years before police caught the real murderers.

Taufik said wrongful convictions still occur, naturally with the largest risk posed to death row convicts.

Another prominent campaigner against capital punishment is lawyer Todung Mulya Lubis, who argues a life sentence should be the maximum penalty.

“Put perpetrators in prison and never grant them clemency or amnesty,” he told a discussion on
clemency for drug convicts.

Capital punishment was not effective here, he said, noting that terrorism was still rife despite the
execution of the Bali bombers.

Meanwhile, Harris Azhar from the independent Commission for Missing Persons and Victims of Violence (Kontras) said that death convicts often faced uncertain and lengthy periods of time before their execution.

“They must wait for years even though the legal process has concluded. This is unfair for them,” he said. The Law and Human Rights Ministry lists 45 convicts who have been on death row for almost 10 years, while around 12 have been waited for 20 years.

Earlier this year, Bahar bin Matar, a death row inmate charged with robbery, murder, rape and abduction, died at a hospital in Cilacap, Central Java. He had been held at the Nusakambangan Island prison for more than 40 years, following the delivery of his sentence in March, 1970.

In 2008, convicted murderers Sumiarsih and her son Sugeng were executed for killing a marine and four of his family members in 1988. The convicts had waited on death row for 20 years.

Legal process when seeking presidential clemency

1. The defendant is sentenced to death

2. The right to plead for clemency is notified by the judge to the defendant or the presiding judge who issues the verdict at the first level. In a case of the defendant being absent, the defendant’s right is notified in writing by the court.

3.
A plea for clemency may be requested by the defendant’s nuclear family with his or her agreement

4.
The law and human rights minister delivers the plea for clemency to the President

• A plea for clemency may be filed following the issuance of a legally binding verdict

• A plea for clemency may be filed within a maximum of one year following the issuance of legally binding verdict

• A plea for clemency is filed in writing by the defendant, or his or her lawyer or family, to the President

5. Copies of the plea are delivered to the sentencing court at the first level, to be forwarded to the Supreme Court

6. The plea and its copies may be delivered by the defendant to the head of the prison where he or she is incarcerated

7. Within a maximum of 20 days after receipt of the copy of the plea, the first level court delivers the copy and the defendant’s case files to the Supreme Court

8. Within a maximum of 30 days after receipt of the copy of the plea, the Supreme Court sends its written considerations to the President

9. The President reviews the Supreme Court’s considerations before deciding on the plea for clemency

10. The President’s decision is issued within a maximum of three months after the receiving the Supreme Court’s considerations

11. The President’s decision to accept or reject the plea is delivered to the convict within a maximum of 14 days from the issuance of the decision

12. Copies of the decision are delivered to the Supreme Court, the court issuing the verdict at the first level, the District Prosecutor’s Office that filed the case, and the penitentiary at which the appellant is detained

Source: Law No. 5/2010 on Amendments to Law No. 22/2010 on Clemency

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.