TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

Forget Lapindo?

What can the people of Sidoarjo in East Java, who have been displaced by a mudflow disaster, and the whole nation expect from the state to ensure their rights are protected and that a similar tragedy to that which struck 10 years ago will not reoccur?The statement of Sidoarjo Regent Saiful Ilah, who called on the victims to forget the calamity and start their life anew, is discouraging

The Jakarta Post
Tue, May 31, 2016

Share This Article

Change Size

Forget Lapindo?

W

hat can the people of Sidoarjo in East Java, who have been displaced by a mudflow disaster, and the whole nation expect from the state to ensure their rights are protected and that a similar tragedy to that which struck 10 years ago will not reoccur?

The statement of Sidoarjo Regent Saiful Ilah, who called on the victims to forget the calamity and start their life anew, is discouraging. It will be another disaster for those who have been made to suffer if the regent’s view is representative of that of policymakers.

“The Lapindo mudflow has buried our villages. The state has forgotten to help us rebuild our lives. Our voices will not die down,” reads the headstone of a tomb laid on the mudflow area to mark the tragedy.

On Sunday dozens of people gathered near the tomb to pray not only for their own well-being but also for the government to not sweep the lingering problems caused by the mud disaster under the rug now that most of those displaced have been compensated.

Many questions have remained unanswered after a decade that passed quickly for most of us who did not have to feel the sorrow of seeing hot mud submerge our homes, playgrounds, villages and even the graves of our parents.

As of Monday more than 100 families are still yet to receive compensation, according to government body Sidoarjo Mud Mitigation Agency (BPLS) data.

The agency, like Saiful, has said administrative matters had slowed down payment of the compensation, but added that they would be solved soon.

However, such a fundamental question as why the state has settled for a certain scientific study that concluded the mudflow was a natural disaster, whilst another study, which was also scientifically valid, found human error was behind the mudflow, has never been addressed.

Nevertheless the government agreed to share the burden by compensating those living outside the directly affected areas, while PT Lapindo Brantas, the operator of the gas field where the epicenter of the disaster is located, is handling people within the most-affected areas. Worse still, the government has agreed to absolve PT Lapindo of any financial responsibility for the compensation. Perhaps such state generosity, such taxpayer-funded generosity, is a cynical reflection of how well the principle of gotong royong (mutual help) characterizes how Indonesia works.

The controversy does not stop there. PT Lapindo, partly owned by the family of Golkar Party chief patron Aburizal Bakrie, has proposed a new drilling project close to the hotspots, ignoring the trauma of the residents and the fact that the mud is still flowing.

A recent study conducted by Surabaya’s November 10 Institute of Technology upon the request of East Java Governor Soekarwo found that land had subsided by 5 centimeters per year since 2010 in villages where the new drilling projects will take place.

History shows this is a nation that easily forgives, something that deserves plaudits. But this is exactly the loophole that many parties tend to capitalize on to evade taking care of their responsibilities. There are indeed efforts to make us forget the deprivation of human rights caused by the Lapindo mudflow disaster.

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.