TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

Witness denies own statements in e-ID graft case

News Desk (The Jakarta Post)
Jakarta
Thu, March 23, 2017

Share This Article

Change Size

Witness denies own statements in e-ID graft case An official scans an applicant's retina to collect data for an e-ID card in Menteng, Central Jakarta, Sept. 14, 2016. (JP/Dhoni Setiawan)

F

ormer House of Representatives member Miryam S. Haryani, a witness in a graft case related to the electronic identity card (e-ID) procurement project, has renounced her statements recorded in the case’s investigation report, saying she was coerced by investigators.

“I want to revoke all [of my statements],” she said on Thursday. The former lawmaker was testifying in the third hearing of the trial of Irman and Sugiharto, two former high-ranking officials at the Home Ministry.

Miryam was a member of House Commission II, which oversees regional affairs, for the 2009-2014 period, when the graft allegedly occurred.

Breaking down in tears, Miryam told the Jakarta Corruption Court’s panel of judges that she had been intimidated by Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) investigators during her questioning. 

“An investigator told me: ‘In 2010, we should have caught you’, I was very depressed during the questioning,” said Miryam.

(Read also: KPK names Andi Narogong a suspect in e-ID graft case)

She denied claims that she had disbursed money, reportedly coming from the Rp 5.9 trillion (US$440 million) e-ID project, as stated in the prosecutors’ indictment, to commission members.

Reading from the case dossier, presiding judge Jhon Halasan Butarbutar said the KPK questioned Miryam four times, namely on Dec. 1, Dec. 7 and Dec. 14, 2016, and on Jan. 24.

Sugiharto’s lawyers said they would call other witnesses to the next hearing as they felt Miryam’s denial of her own statements might make the situation worse for their client. They added that they had witnesses who could prove that the ex-lawmaker had accepted bribes in the project. (mrc/ebf)

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.