Jakarta Post

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post
The Jakarta Post
Video Weather icon 30°C
DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
30°C Partly Cloudy

Dry and mostly cloudy throughout the day.

  • Wed

    26℃ - 32℃

  • Thu

    25℃ - 32℃

  • Fri

    25℃ - 31℃

  • Sat

    26℃ - 30℃

Ahok’s lawyers yet to receive court’s verdict document

  • News Desk
    News Desk

    The Jakarta Post

Jakarta | Tue, April 17, 2018 | 06:43 pm
Ahok’s lawyers yet to receive court’s verdict document North Jakarta District Court presiding judge Mulyadi (center) presides over the hearing of the case review on Feb. 26, submitted by former Jakarta governor Basuki “Ahok” Tjahaja Purnama on the blasphemy case last year. (JP/Dhoni Setiawan)

Former Jakarta governor Basuki “Ahok” Tjahaja Purnama’s lawyers have yet to receive a copy of the rejection verdict on the case review petition from the Supreme Court four weeks after the verdict was reported by media.

“We haven’t got it yet. If I have, I will inform [media],” said one of Ahok’s lawyers, Josefina Syukur, on Tuesday, as quoted by kompas.com.

Ahok filed a case review request to the Supreme Court on April 2 related to his blasphemy case, which had given him a two-year prison sentence.

Media reported on the day that the panel of judges, led by justice Artidjo Alkostar, had rejected Ahok’s petition on March 26.

Days after the verdict, reports emerged about Artidjo’s connection to radical group Islam Defenders Front (FPI), an organization behind a series of rallies pushing the government to arrest and convict Ahok last year.

Artidjo denied the reports.

Ahok’s other lawyer, Fifi Lety Indra, earlier said it was strange because the lawyers had yet to receive the copy of the verdict weeks after the decision.

Fifi had also questioned the Supreme Court’s swift ruling, only 19 days after receiving the case dossier from the North Jakarta District Court.

She said for other cases, like the murder case that had convicted former Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) chairman Antasari Azhar, it took 122 days for the court to reject the case review petition. (wnd)

Join the discussions