TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Judge slashes award but upholds verdict in Monsanto cancer trial
A San Francisco judge on Monday upheld a jury verdict that found Monsanto liable for not warning a groundskeeper that its weed killer product Roundup might cause cancer, but slashed the damages award.
Change Size
Activists from E.Z.L.N - Ensemble Zoologique de Liberation de la Nature (Zoological Ensemble for Nature's Liberation) stage a demonstration against the weed-killer glyphosate and US agrochimical company Monsanto in front of the Justice Palace in Brussels where nine of their activists are facing justice after an action against pesticides, on Nov.9. EU countries failed to agree to a proposal to extend the license for the controversial weed-killer glyphosate by five years, prompting the Commission to say it will resubmit the proposal at the end of the month.
(AFP/Emmanuel Dunand)
A San Francisco judge on Monday upheld a jury verdict that found Monsanto liable for not warning a groundskeeper that its weed killer product Roundup might cause cancer, but slashed the damages award.
Judge Suzanne Bolanos denied Monsanto's request for a new trial but cut the $289 million damages award to $78 million to comply with the law regarding how punitive damages awards must be calculated.
Jurors in August unanimously found that Monsanto acted with "malice" and that its weed killers Roundup and the professional grade version RangerPro contributed "substantially" to Dewayne Johnson's terminal illness.
The jury ordered Monsanto to pay $250 million in punitive damages along with compensatory damages and other costs, bringing the total figure to nearly $290 million.
Johnson, a California groundskeeper diagnosed in 2014 with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma -- a cancer that affects white blood cells -- says he repeatedly used a professional form of Roundup while working at a school in Benicia, California.
"Although we believe a reduction in punitive damages was unwarranted and we are weighing the options, we are pleased the Court did not disturb the verdict," Johnson's lawyers said in a released statement.
"The evidence presented to this jury was, quite frankly, overwhelming."
In her ruling, Bolanos gave Johnson the choice of accepting the lessened damages award or triggering a new trial focused on what Monsanto should pay in the case.
Johnson's lawyers told AFP they are considering which option to pursue.
- 'Important win' -
"That said, today is a triumph for our legal system," Johnson's lawyers contended, calling the judge's ruling "an important win."
Monsanto did not respond to requests for comment.
Monsanto attorney George Lombardi argued in court earlier this month that the evidence presented at trial did not support the jury verdict, and that an attorney for Johnson was wrong to urge jurors to teach the company a lesson.
In motions filed after the August verdict, Monsanto urged the judge to strip away the entire $250 million punitive portion of the damages, arguing that a new trial was justified.
Johnson's lawsuit built on 2015 findings by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, part of the UN World Health Organization, which classified Roundup's main ingredient glyphosate as a probable carcinogen, causing the state of California to follow suit.
Monsanto vice president Scott Partridge told reporters outside the courthouse the day of the verdict that "the jury got it wrong."
Monsanto has defended the weed killer, arguing that it has a 40-year history of safe use.
