Social and cultural norms have pushed women and girls in particular to bear the cost of time disproportionately: to do cooking, unpaid domestic chores, caring jobs and more often for poor women, on top of their work responsibilities such as selling street food, becoming domestic workers, etc.
ust like other people who develop a sense of community through food and eating together, Indonesians love good food and have many “collective eating” traditions. As an Indonesian living abroad, I often miss Indonesian food and occasionally drive for hours to have a proper Indonesian meal, though it’s often overpriced, even for the locals. The best home cooking for 20 years was served by my mother, which I didn’t have to pay for (though I had to wash the dishes afterward), but was it really free?
As they say, there’s no such thing as a free lunch: If we get it for free, someone else must pay for the costs. It can be real costs, which are tangible and intangible, and opportunity costs (what could have been done, if it did not happen). In the case of home cooking, how much do we spend to create such a meal? How much do we spend for chicken, spices, rice, oil and vegetables, for instance? And how about my mother’s time and energy?
Poverty studies have started to acknowledge time-use as part of endowment or resources, as humans’ inherited “commodity”. It means, no matter how rich or how poor you are, we are all entitled to 24 hours a day to do things we want or have to do. Nevertheless, social and cultural norms have pushed women and girls in particular to bear the cost of time disproportionately: to do cooking, unpaid domestic chores, caring jobs and more often for poor women, on top of their work responsibilities such as selling street food, becoming domestic workers, etc.
Several studies, including those by scholars, the World Bank, and United Nations agencies aim to understand how socioeconomic class and gender reshape a person’s ability to control their time use and its impact on social economic development and improvement of gender equality.
My study with the Individual Deprivation Measure in South Sulawesi in 2018 confirmed that both poor men and women have less control over their time, as the impact of their precarious work and mounting domestic and community-related responsibilities; but women are often burdened with more responsibilities, that cost their time-use more than men. Both in the urban and rural areas, women have to deal with various activities in their different capacities and identities: in the individual, domestic and community sphere.
For instance, in outskirt areas in South Sulawesi, women are required to help prepare social, religious and cultural events, including the meals, costumes and performances. This might seem trivial but this situation in medium to long term can hamper government efforts to reduce poverty and improve gender equality as the implication of marginalized groups’ inability to control their time.
Of course, there are positive implications of involving women in broader social events and giving them more responsibility to make decisions in the community and society level but we might also risk women’s wellbeing through taking out their limited leisure time and the opportunity costs attached to it.
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.