As the public scrutinizes the performances of the presidential candidate pairs during the first election debate, many people have expressed disappointment over how both tickets failed to achieve any breakthrough on substantial issues
As the public scrutinizes the performances of the presidential candidate pairs during the first election debate, many people have expressed disappointment over how both tickets failed to achieve any breakthrough on substantial issues.
The first debate with Joko “Jokowi” Widodo and Ma’ruf Amin against Prabowo Subianto and Sandiaga Uno, conducted around the themes of law, human rights, corruption and terrorism, has failed to impress activists and analysts whose work revolves around the topics.
The critics argued that the event appeared only as a formality and that there was “nothing new”, let alone any comprehensive solutions offered by the candidate pairs.
As a presidential contender, Prabowo was expected to question the incumbent about his administration’s record and efforts over the last four years. However, he failed to do so, said the Gadjah Mada University’s Corruption Studies Center director Zainal Arifin Mochtar.
“Prabowo failed to explore his privilege as a rival who can offer initiatives for change and at the same time Jokowi failed to explain what his administration has done over the last four and a half years,” Zainal said on Friday.
Concerning corruption, Jokowi cited legal reforms, firm law enforcement and better internal and external supervision of the bureaucracy, while Prabowo said he aimed to “solve the root cause of graft” by increasing the incomes of civil servants and law enforcers.
Both presidential candidates also vowed to strengthen the Corruption Eradication Commission, although no one gave specific details about what they would do.
“If I were Prabowo, I would ask Jokowi to explain why corruption still exists even after he has served for more than four years in office. It should have been so simple,” he said.
Thursday’s debate also confirmed some analysts’ predictions that foretold the candidates would tip-toe around human rights issues, often seen as the weakest points of both Jokowi and Prabowo.
Jokowi has been attacked by opposition activists for allegedly improperly prosecuting clerics and other staunch critics of his administration, while Prabowo himself has been implicated in the alleged kidnapping of pro-democracy activists in 1997 and 1998.
In his opening statement, the incumbent renewed his 2014 presidential campaign vows, namely to continue efforts to solve past human rights abuse cases. Prabowo, meanwhile, did not mention anything related to human rights in his speech.
It was almost as if the two presidential candidates had agreed beforehand not to discuss such issues, said Putri Kanesia of the Commission for Missing Persons and Victims of Violence. “Both candidate pairs appeared to choose to play a safe game. They also left out important issues in human rights, such as the death penalty, protection of minorities and vulnerable groups [...] or the forced closure of churches,” Putri said.
With regards to human rights protection, Jokowi and Prabowo both promised to protect citizens from religious-based discrimination and violence, as well as to uphold the rights of disabled people.
Institute for Criminal Justice Reform executive director Anggara said the candidates failed to talk about resolving overlapping laws that regulated criminal offenses, as they instead focussed on harmonization of national laws and local ordinances.
Anggara cited the example of a 2014 law on the protection of witnesses and victims that stipulated the fulfillment of rights for victims in criminal cases. However, the mechanisms to do so were still scattered throughout several other laws.
While answering questions about counterterrorism efforts, both candidate pairs asserted the importance of assessing the root causes of terrorism to address the issue and of improving deradicalization measures.
Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict direct
or Sidney Jones said neither Jokowi nor Prabowo touched on significant issues in the topic, such as the need for better rehabilitation programs for deportees and for paying more attention to women in extremist networks.
“Neither candidate had anything interesting to say at a time when it is clear that lots more can be done,” Jones said.
Debate Round 1: Fact check
Joko “Jokowi” Widodo
Statement:
According to Indonesia Corruption Watch, the Gerindra Party fielded former corruption convicts as legislative candidates.
TRUE
In
January, the graft watchdog said six Gerindra legislative candidates
had served prison sentences for corruption. Among them was the head of
the party’s Jakarta executive board, M. Taufik, who is running for a
seat on the province’s legislative council.
Statement:
Regarding
equality [for disabled people], I can share as an example that we gave
Asian Para Games medalists the same cash bonuses that we gave Asian
Games medalists.
TRUE
Asian Para Games medalists received the same cash bonuses from the government as their Asian Games counterparts.
Each
individual gold medalist competing in a singles event received Rp 1.5
billion (US$ 98,716), while for doubles the amount was set at Rp 1
billion and Rp 750 million for team events. Their coaches received
between Rp 450 million and Rp 600 million each, and their assistants
between Rp 300 million and Rp 375 million.
Silver and bronze medalists, as well as their coaches and assistant coaches received between Rp 100 million and Rp 500 million.
Statement:
With
the online single submission (OSS) system, Pak [Sandiaga], as a
businessman, can go to the office and will only have to wait two hours.
After that, the requested permits will be issued and you can start your
business immediately.
THEORETICALLY TRUE, BUT
The OSS is a
web-based business licensing system intended to cut red tape involved
in obtaining business permits. It was initially operated by the Office
of the Coordinating Economic Minister from its launch in July to
December, before being handed over to the Investment Coordinating Board
(BKPM) on Jan. 2.
Indonesian Employers Association (Apindo)
chairman Hariyadi Sukamdani said the time needed to issue a permit
depended on its type. “If it’s only a basic permit for service
businesses, it shouldn’t take a long time.”
“I hear many
complaints from businesspeople that it takes a long time for permits to
be issued, especially when they involve other parties, such as regional
administrations, as they have additional procedures that need to be
followed,” he told The Jakarta Post.
In December, the head of the
Aceh chapter of Apindo, Dahlan Sulaiman, complained about the lengthy
process, saying that he had yet to obtain an extension for his business
location permit three months after registering in the OSS.
Hariyadi
added that poor management by the Office of the Coordinating Economic
Minister had contributed to the sluggish process. “The problem should
have been resolved when the system was handed over to the BKPM.”
_____________
Statement:
It
is OK for regional leaders, including governors, to clearly state their
support for Jokowi-Ma’ruf. However, there is a village head in East
Java who was arrested for declaring his support for Prabowo-Sandiaga.
PARTLY TRUE
In
December, the Mojokerto District Court found Suhartono, the village
head of Sampangagung in Mojokerto, East Java, guilty of disbursing money
and mobilizing people to welcome vice-presidential candidate Sandiaga
Uno, who was set to pass through the village. Suhartono, however, was
not found guilty for declaring his support for Prabowo-Sandiaga.
Judges
had sentenced him to two months in jail and also ordered him to pay a
Rp 6 million (US$422) fine for violating the 2017 Election Law, which
prohibits village heads from carrying out any action that may benefit or
harm election candidates during a campaign.
However, a number of
regional leaders — most of whom were elected in the 2018 regional
elections — voiced their support for Jokowi’s presidential bid after
being inaugurated by the President.
Statement:
I
know terrorists are sent from other countries and they often disguise
themselves as Muslims, even though they are controlled by someone who is
not a Muslim or even foreigners.
FALSE
Institute of
Policy Analysis of Conflict director Sidney Jones said there was a small
fringe of homegrown extremists that had been plaguing the country since
the early days of Darul Islam in the 1950s.
“It is wrong to
assume that the leaders of Jemaah Islamiyah, the men who carried out the
2005 Tentena bombings [in Central Sulawesi] or those involved in the
Surabaya bombings [in 2018] were manipulated by outsiders,” Jones told
the Post.
She added that poverty was obviously not the main
driver of terrorism across the country, because if it was, “Indonesia
would have a far bigger terrorism problem than it does.”
Statement:
How
can the governor’s salary be Rp 8 million, when he or she has to manage
a province, for example Central Java, which is larger than Malaysia,
with a large regional budget?
TECHNICALLY TRUE, BUT
Governors also receive allowances.
Government
Regulation No. 59/2000 on regional leaders’ wages stipulates that all
governors receive a monthly wage of Rp 3 million. Moreover, a 2000
presidential decree on state officials’ allowances mandates that a
governor will receive an allowance of Rp 5.4 million every month.
According
to Government Regulation No. 109/200, a governor also receives an
operational allowance, the amount of which depends on the amount of
locally-generated revenue (PAD).
The governor of Central Java,
which recorded PAD of Rp 11.9 trillion in 2017, can receive up to Rp
17.85 billion in operational allowances. In total, the Central Java
governor can receive up to Rp 17.9 billion every month.
It is also misleading to compare the province with a country.
According
to Statistics Indonesia (BPS), the total area of Central Java is 32,544
square kilometers. Meanwhile, the total area of Malaysia is 329,847 sq
km, according to the CIA’s World Factbook.
Central Java’s population is indeed larger than Malaysia with 34.2 million people in 2017, as recorded by BPS — compared to Malaysia’s population of 31.8 million people, according to the CIA’s estimate in July.
- JP/Kharisar Kahfi
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.