The Korea Herald/Asia News Network
Korean author Han Kang and translator Deborah Smith (L) pose for a photograph with The Vegetarian at a photocall in London on May 15, 2016, ahead of tomorrow's announcement of the winner of the 2016 Man Booker International Prize. (AFP/Leon Neal)
Literary translator and professor Kim Wook-dong asserted in his recently published article that the English version of the novel “The Vegetarian” has a significant number of mistranslations.
In his article published online on March 30, Kim wrote that “The Vegetarian,” a winning novel of the 2016 Man Booker International Prize, contains many more mistranslations than what “one would expect from a professional translator.”
Kim is a professor emeritus of English literature at Sogang University and currently teaches at Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology. He translated several celebrated English works including “The Great Gatsby,” “Animal Farm,” “Catcher in the Rye” and more into Korean.
In the article titled, “The ‘Creative’ English Translation of ‘The Vegetarian’ by Han Kang,” Kim identified specific errors in the translation of “The Vegetarian” from Korean into English. For instance, Kim pointed out that Deborah Smith, the translator of the book, had not distinguished between basic Korean words referring to arms and legs, and thus had made the mistake of translating “arms” to “feet” and vice versa.
He also observed that Smith had not translated Korean slang and colloquial expressions correctly, such as in cases where “the kid who works part-time” in Korean had been translated to “the babysitter.”
The accuracy of the translation of “The Vegetarian” has provoked much debate in Korea since its winning of the Man Booker prize. As a response to the controversy, Smith and the author Han Kang have come forward to explain that such mistranslations were not a serious obstacle to conveying the original meaning of the novel.
Professor Kim said in an interview with the Yonhap News Agency that he “had written the article straight after reading the English version of ‘The Vegetarian,’” but British journals had declined his request to publish it.
Kim’s article can be found in the latest issue of Translation Review, Volume 100.