The Jakarta Post | Fri, 11/20/2009 9:33 AM | Opinion
The average rise of only 15 percent in excise taxes the government will slap on tobacco products starting next year takes into consideration only fiscal revenues and the old facts that the cigarette industry is a major employer, a big source of tax receipts and livelihood for hundreds of thousands of farmers.
The tobacco excise tax policy completely ignores the urgent need for tobacco control to minimize health hazards inflicted by smokers on themselves and the people around them.
Little wonder cigarette prices here remain the lowest in Asia. A pack of Marlboro, for example, costs only about Rp 10,000 (US$1), as against the equivalent of Rp 60,000 in the United States.
Worse still, as Indonesia is one of only two countries in Asia – North Korea is the other – that have not yet ratified the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, our country has become a paradise for tobacco producers where cigarette companies are virtually free to market and advertise.
Look at how such international companies as Philip Morris International of the US and BAT, faced with severely tough marketing regulations in the developed world, had been willing to pay premium prices to acquire control of PT Sampoerna and PT Bentoel, two of the four biggest cigarette producers, in 2005 and 2007, respectively.
In the absence of a comprehensive regulatory framework on tobacco marketing and promotion, the taxing power is now the most effective tool available to decrease the number of smokers or at least curb its growth.
Hence, the government should have raised the excise taxes by a much higher rate to make tobacco prices punitively high.
The excise tax law allows excise taxes on tobacco products to be as high as 275 percent of their factory prices or 57 percent of their retail prices.
Raising tobacco excise taxes is politically and commercially an easy way of increasing fiscal revenues because the estimated 70-80 million addicted smokers in the country, who consume about 250-270 billion cigarettes a year, are not likely to organize street protests.
The government should no longer be held captive to the perception that strictly controlling tobacco marketing would adversely harm the economy.
Certainly, it is obviously impossible to completely and immediately ban smoking, given the estimated seven million people directly employed in the industry, the 600,000 farmers living on tobacco growing and the significant sum of fiscal revenue – Rp 56 trillion next year – the government will raise from tobacco excise taxes.
This is all the more reason the government should devise a long-term, comprehensive tobacco consumption and marketing regulation to allow time for tobacco farmers to diversify into other crops and the government to seek alternative sources of revenue to replace tobacco.
While the enactment of a law on tobacco control could jump-start a nationwide campaign against smoking, there is actually not a single law now that prohibits the government from issuing and enforcing regulations on tobacco control through severe restrictions on sales, advertisements on buildings and places where people can light up.
The government should ally with anti-tobacco NGOs to launch a nationwide antismoking campaign to make people understand the full extent of the grave health hazards caused by smoking and to create a conducive public-opinion environment against smoking.
Tobacco control is not discriminative treatment of a legal industrial product but is all about health protection.
Nairdah (not verified), Sydney — Sat, 11/21/2009 - 9:15am
A Florida court in the USA (AFP 20-11-09), has just ordered tobacco giant Philip Morris to pay a whopping $300 MILLION compensation to a suffering smoker. And there are another 8,000 law cases in the same queue seeking awards against tobacco companies. Now, IF the millions of Indonesians suffering and dying from tobacco caused disease all sued the tobacco companies for damages they would bring a lot more revenue into the country than the extra tobacco taxes collected by the Government. OR would the tobacco companies argue that an Indonesian life is worth a lot less than an American life ($300 million)? Discount Pak? I would even settle for 10% of that figure!Nairdah (not verified), Sydney — Fri, 11/20/2009 - 12:26pm
Could only be described as a cynical move, when revenue is more important than the HEALTH of the people. All levels of Government allow massive promotion of an addictive killer drug - after all, they have a vested interest in harvesting the revenue. The Government could be justified in raising excise taxes, even higher, if it was part of a HEALTH package to improve the health of the people. It is not. If the Government stopped listening to the tobacco lobby, stopped using 'flat earth' economic arguements about the economic BENEFITS of tobacco to the nation and thought about the real COST of tobacco in terms of lost working hours, loss of skilled workers, the poverty created by the death of the breadwinners (yes, usually working males),hospital beds and health services to cater for the lung cancer victims, not to mention the hardship and heartbreak from the death by tobacco of 450,000 Indonesian citizens EVERY year (2 million in a Presidential term)Then it might find the heart to stop burying its head in the sand on tobacco. STOP THE DENIAL, THINK OF THE PEOPLE WHO ARE DYING (circa 1,200 EVERY day. RIP).Nevets Nworb (not verified), Jakarta — Fri, 11/20/2009 - 10:06am
Could not agree more with this article.