Jakarta Post

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post
press enter to search

The Jakarta Post
Video Weather icon 26°C
DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
26°C Light Rain

Rain until tomorrow morning, starting again tomorrow afternoon.

  • Thu

    26℃ - 31℃

  • Fri

    26℃ - 32℃

  • Sat

    27℃ - 32℃

  • Sun

    26℃ - 30℃

Govt plans levy on sweetened, carbonated drinks

  • Hans David Tampubolon

    The Jakarta Post

Jakarta | Wed, December 12 2012 | 10:14 am

In an attempt to control the consumption of sweetened, carbonated beverages, the government is planning to impose a levy on the drinks which, if consumed, are believed to negatively impact people’s health.

Finance Ministry fiscal agency interim head Bambang Brodjonegoro said in Jakarta on Tuesday that consumption of sweetened, carbonated beverages needed to be controlled because of health concerns.

“Based on the report compiled by the National Drug and Food Monitoring Agency (BPOM), excessive consumption of sweetened, carbonated drinks can damage the kidneys, increase the risk of diabetes, trigger uric acid, disturb the functions of the stomach, liver, intestine and cause obesity,” Bambang told legislators during a hearing with the House of Representatives’ Commission XI overseeing finance and banking.

Due to the potentially damaging health impacts of carbonated sweet drinks, Bambang said that the consumption of the drinks should then be imposed using a levy scheme as an instrument.

“Philosophically speaking, imposing a levy on sweetened, carbonated drinks is in line with Law No. 39/2007 on levies,” Bambang said.

Bambang added that imposing a levy on carbonated drinks to control excessive consumption was common practice in at least 79 countries, so Indonesia should follow suit.

“Even the US, which is the main producer of carbonated drinks, applies a levy on the product,” he said.

Another reason considered by the government to impose the levy was the fact that the market share of carbonated sweet drinks in the soft drink industry was still relatively small but yet managed to post a significant amount of sales, according to Bambang.

Based on data from the Association of Soft Drink Manufacturers (ASRIM), sweetened, carbonated drinks accounted for only 3.8 percent of the country’s beverage market in 2011, far below bottled water with an 84 percent share. Regardless of the small market share, sweetened, carbonated drink sales in that year reached a total of Rp 10 trillion (US$1.03 billion), while bottled water reached Rp 18 trillion.

“This data shows that there’s still a lot of room for the growth of sweetened, carbonated drink consumption in the future and this also hints at the large potential for a levy to be collected,” Bambang said.

According to Bambang, the government was currently analyzing five levy schemes, ranging between Rp 1,000 per liter to Rp 5,000 per liter, on sweetened, carbonated drinks, the consumption of which was estimated to be around 790 million liters in 2012.

Based on the consumption rate and the schemes, Bambang said that the government could collect at least Rp 790 billion to Rp 3.95 trillion from the levy each year.

One of the commission’s deputy chairmen, Andi Timo Pangerang from the Democratic Party, said that legislators agreed with the government’s idea to impose a levy on the drinks but added that further assessments and deliberations were required to ensure the policy would not heavily burden both consumers and industrial players.

If the proposal is approved, the drinks will become the country’s third targeted levy, after tobacco and alcoholic drinks.

Indonesian Food and Beverage Association (GAPMMI) chairman Adhie S. Lukman said that industrial players objected to the idea and urged the government to annul it.

“Unlike tobacco and alcohol, carbonated drinks do not pose a severe threat to health,” Adhie said.

“The government should have attempted to provide more incentives to push the industry to grow so that more taxes can be collected. Therefore, we officially reject this levy proposal on carbonated drinks,” he added.


Join the discussions