I

'€™m always a little disappointed when I see a moving train and there aren'€™t two men fighting on top, aren'€™t you? Not that I watch too many movies.

But talking of fighting, this writer has been advised to take out a massive lawsuit against a vile individual who has fouled up my whole life. I refer, of course, to myself. Suing yourself is all the rage these days, I hear from a reader who works as a paralegal ('€œlawyer who leaps from planes'€).

He told me that last year in the US state of Minnesota, a government van crashed into a parked car owned by one Megan Campbell. She took out a lawsuit against the van driver, a government staffer named, yes, Megan Campbell.

This meant her employer had to pay for repairs, so everyone was happy. Except for the poor old taxpayer, but come on, we all know by now that allowing himself to be robbed every day of the year is the taxpayer'€™s reason for
existing, right?

The report reminded me of China'€™s State Religious Affairs Bureau Order No. 5, which specifies that people who have been reincarnated as elite masters of wisdom must have had their names previously recorded on a Reincarnation Application Form.

(This is not a joke.) Clearly my current pitiful existence is a direct result of the total hash I made of form-filling in an earlier life, so that incarnation of me deserves to be sued for every penny he has, as soon as I can work out how to do it.

Regular contributors to this page added examples. A US jailbird named Brock sued himself for millions of US dollars for giving himself alcohol which caused him to commit crimes. He argued that since he was a ward of prison, the authorities would have to pay this huge sum to the victim, i.e., him.

However, the US legal system refused to support this utterly ridiculous lawsuit, which is odd, because I thought supporting utterly ridiculous lawsuits was their main activity.

The most convoluted case was sent in by reader Sunita Chau, and came from the London borough of Islington.

An authority employee gave a parking ticket to an authority vehicle, the driver of which filed an appeal to the authority, which rejected it, causing the authority to file a second appeal which the authority accepted, inspiring the authority to demand costs from the authority which the authority rejected on the grounds that it was just too absurd. Well, they would know.

Earlier this year, the chief prosecutor in the government of Zambia was accused of shocking irregularities in the way he ran his office. He referred the case to himself for judgment and dismissed it. His critics said that by finding himself not guilty he proved he was guilty.

This is the sort of circular paradox that causes philosophers to suffer cranial short-circuits, so hide this page from any who might be passing.

Now if you'€™ll excuse me, I need to fill in a Reincarnation Application Form so that I am reborn as an elite master of wisdom.

Not that you'€™ll notice any difference. But anything'€™s better than my current role in life: Taxpayer.