Final score: A card shows the results of a House of Representatives vote to elect new Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) leaders on Thursday
span class="caption">Final score: A card shows the results of a House of Representatives vote to elect new Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) leaders on Thursday. Anticorruption activists have cast doubt on the five new commissioners' commitment to fighting graft, warning that they could be used to weaken the commission from the inside. (TEMPO/Dhemas Reviyanto)
Five newly elected Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) leaders pose an internal threat to the commission's very existence, activists fear.
West Sumatra Anticorruption Integrity Institution chairman Arif Paderi said recently that attempts to diminish the role of the anticorruption body had been in play since the beginning of the House of Representatives' screening of potential new KPK commissioners.
The selection committee from House Commission III, which oversees legal affairs, Arif said, had included candidates with a dubious commitment to eradicating corruption, with some candidates having no background in corruption eradication and other having, as judges, found in favor of graft suspects.
"There were indications of a grand design to weaken the KPK and [to hamper] corruption eradication. Those indications have been proven to be true. Farewell, KPK," Arif said as quoted by Tempo.co.
On Thursday, Commission III elected to the KPK leadership Alexander Marwata, Basaria Panjaitan, Laode Syarif, Saut Situmorang and Agus Rahardjo, the latter as chairman.
According to Arif, it would have been naïve to expect the House to choose candidates with a firm commitment to fighting corruption, or to expect President Joko 'Jokowi' Widodo to intervene.
"Jokowi does not care about the attempts to weaken the KPK and hamper the eradication of corruption," he said, adding that a planned revision to the KPK Law would further undermine the commission.
Similarly, Hifdzil Alim, a researcher from the Anticorruption Studies Center at Gadjah Mada University, said that the KPK would be destroyed from the inside, with the five new commissioners acting as a Trojan horse.
Hifdzil noted that Alexander, a former Jakarta Corruption Court ad hoc judge, had previously released a number of corruption suspects, that National Police General Basaria was weak and subservient, that Saut had a record of nepotism and that Agus, a former manager of the National Procurement Agency, had repeatedly ignored the suspicious wealth reports of a number of government officials.
"During screening, several of them even tried to butter up lawmakers by attacking the KPK," he added.
Another Anticorruption Studies Center researcher, Zaenur Rochman, said that most of the five new commissioners were in favor of the KPK Law revision, while others wanted to end investigations into the Bank Century and Bank Indonesia liquidity support cases.
"Some of them seemed to believe that reporting on corruption cases lowers the corruption perception index, while others lambasted the KPK for entrapment," Zaenur said.(afr/dan)
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.
Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.