TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

Prison sentence leaves questions unanswered in Djoko Tjandra case

Judges of the Jakarta Corruption Court sentenced Pinangki to 10 years in prison for accepting bribes from Djoko Tjandra in exchange for securing a Supreme Court acquittal.

Dyaning Pangestika (The Jakarta Post)
Premium
Jakarta
Tue, February 9, 2021

Share This Article

Change Size

Prison sentence leaves questions unanswered in Djoko Tjandra case Suspended prosecutor Pinangki Sirna Malasari stands during the verdict hearing at the Jakarta Corruption Court on Feb. 8, 2021. Judges sentenced her to 10 years in prison for accepting bribes from Djoko Tjandra in exchange for securing a Supreme Court acquittal. (Antara/Hafidz Mubarak A.)

While the court has handed down a heavier sentence than demanded to suspended prosecutor Pinangki Sirna Malasari for her crimes of helping graft convict Djoko Tjandra while on the run, watchdogs say that several important details of the case remained unknown during the trial.

During a hearing on Monday, judges with the Jakarta Corruption Court sentenced Pinangki to 10 years in prison and a fine of Rp 600 million (US$43,047) for accepting bribes from Djoko to help him secure a Supreme Court acquittal.

Pinangki was also found guilty of money laundering and conspiring to commit an illicit act, presiding judge Eko Purwanto read the verdict as reported by kompas.com.

The verdict was heavier than the sentence demanded by the prosecutors, who were aiming for four years of imprisonment and a Rp 500 million fine.

The judge found several aggravating factors that led to a harsher sentence, such as Pinangki’s role as a prosecutor in helping a fugitive to avoid legal proceedings. She was also deemed to have covered up the involvement of other parties in the case and given inconsistent testimony during the trial.

During the trial, Pinangki insisted that she did not commit money laundering, claiming that she used her late first husband’s money for living and buying luxurious things. But the bench argued that she could not prove the origin of the money.

to Read Full Story

  • Unlimited access to our web and app content
  • e-Post daily digital newspaper
  • No advertisements, no interruptions
  • Privileged access to our events and programs
  • Subscription to our newsletters
or

Purchase access to this article for

We accept

TJP - Visa
TJP - Mastercard
TJP - GoPay

Redirecting you to payment page

Pay per article

Prison sentence leaves questions unanswered in Djoko Tjandra case

Rp 29,000 / article

1
Create your free account
By proceeding, you consent to the revised Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.
Already have an account?

2
  • Palmerat Barat No. 142-143
  • Central Jakarta
  • DKI Jakarta
  • Indonesia
  • 10270
  • +6283816779933
2
Total Rp 29,000

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.