Cyber law worries bloggers

Tifa Asrianti ,  The Jakarta Post ,  Jakarta   |  Mon, 04/07/2008 11:16 AM  |  Headlines

In a meeting organized by the British Council on Friday, bloggers expressed concerns the new law on electronic information and transaction could make them susceptible to charges of defamation.

Blogger Enda Nasution said bloggers were being more careful now as the law opened up possibilities of prosecution for providing "sensitive" content about public figures and certain issues on their sites.

"Bloggers can get in trouble by just linking to a website containing defamation. In an indirect way, the law bans freedom of expression," Enda said.

After two years of deliberation, the House of Representatives passed the Electronic Information and Transaction Law last month, which prohibits citizens from distributing slander in any electronic format. Perpetrators can get a maximum of six years in prison or a fine of Rp 1 billion (US$107,526).

The law also prohibits any kind of pornography, gambling, blackmail, lies, threats and racist comments.

Another blogger, Wicaksono, said the blogosphere could not be separated from opinions. Therefore, there would always be people who liked or disliked the content and the government should not levy criminal charges against people based on subjective judgments.

"In developed countries, the government lets the communities make regulations to organize themselves. Besides, in other countries, libel is no longer a criminal matter but a civil matter," Wicaksono said.

He said it was bloggers themselves who should make a regulation on expression.

Blogger Raditya Dika said he recently deleted two posts after friends warned him about the defamation articles in the cyber law. One of the posts he took off was a parody of a local election containing deformed photos of the running candidates.

"Even if no cyber law existed, bloggers should always be careful what they say in their blogs because it may offend other people's feelings," he said.

Asmara Letizia said that no law was supposed to regulate how people expressed opinions.

"So far, I haven't deleted anything I have posted in my blogs. I believe we have to be responsible and consistent on what we have said. We can still protest other people as long as we can do it in an unoffending way," she said.

"I think the government should pay more attention to copyright issues because there are cases in which people take blog content from blogs but do not attribute the authors."

Comments (2)  |   Post comment
A  |   A  |   A  |   Mail to a friend  |  Printer Friendly Version |  Digg it!  |  Add to Del.icio.us!  |  Add to Reddit!  |  Stumble it!

The state is the servant of the people, not the other way around.

It seems there is far too much legislation to "protect" people from being upset about something. This is not protection. It is oppression.

If someone says something wrong about me while I am alive and I come to hear about it I can defend myself and rebut it. Once I am dead the works I have, hopefully, left behind can speak for me. I am not afraid of cartoonists or comedians or critics. What I will not tolerate - and no person with an ounce of spirit should tolerate - is any government or official telling me what I can or cannot read, write, see or speak.

I will not steal other people's words and claim them as my own. That is theft and the government has every right to protect us from theft. I deplore violence and I shall never call upon anyone to harm or oppress anyone. It is right for governments to restrict incitement to kill or harm. But that is the limit of what a state can morally and justly do. "Unjust laws are no laws at all." Those are not my words but the words of St Augustine, but I heartily agree with them.

I will always be careful to avoid plagiarism and I would never dream of inciting harm to anyone, but aside from that I hereby give notice to whomsoever it may concern that I shall not pay the slightest heed to any law which restricts what I can read, write, see or speak in any medium. And I call on everyone who has any prinicples of humanity or courage to also ignore any such laws.

Animal Farm, how appropriate. When is a lie not a lie in Indonesia? When it is told by someone with more authority then you. When is the truth slander in Indonesia? When it is told by someone with less authority then you. Only countries based on lies like the Republic of Indonesia have such draconian repressive laws.

Today's Paper

  • Saturday, July 5, 2008

Weekender

  • COVERPAPER-July.jpg