A nice piece of academic thinking (“A ‘difficult marriage’: Sharia and civil law in Indonesia”, May 21), but it does not give any answers or even has the intention to provide a solution to the problem
nice piece of academic thinking (“A ‘difficult marriage’: Sharia andcivil law in Indonesia”, May 21), but it does not give any answers oreven has the intention to provide a solution to the problem.
The writer tends to forge a basic given fact: sharia law is a static, dogmatic set of rules that has not been evolved during the changes in time and social developments.
What was valid 2000 years ago is, from the viewpoint of sharia law, still valid today.
Modern laws in most countries are a dynamic set of rules that are developing according to the changes in society and its requirements to protect society as a whole.
An example is the Indonesian marriage law and the sharia law on marriages.
According to sharia law, a man is able to marry a 9-year-old girl, while the state law has determined that the minimum age for a girl to get married is 16.
For the sake of convenience, stoning to death as the penalty in sharia law for adultery is not recognized in Indonesia (Aceh being the exception); theft (corruption) is penalized in sharia law with the cutting off of hands.
In that respect, I can imagine that this could never be implemented in
Indonesia, as if it was, we would see 40 percent of the civil servants
and politicians with no hands at all.
Jan R. Scheele
Bogor, West Java
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.