TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

Experts raise concerns on use of incinerator in waste facility

Experts have expressed their concerns over the Jakarta administration’s plan to continue the halted Intermediate Waste Treatment Facilities (ITF) project in Sunter, North Jakarta, as it will include the use of an incinerator to treat the city’s garbage

Corry Elyda (The Jakarta Post)
Jakarta
Tue, January 19, 2016 Published on Jan. 19, 2016 Published on 2016-01-19T15:39:40+07:00

Change text size

Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone

Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Experts raise concerns on use of incinerator in waste facility

E

xperts have expressed their concerns over the Jakarta administration'€™s plan to continue the halted Intermediate Waste Treatment Facilities (ITF) project in Sunter, North Jakarta, as it will include the use of an incinerator to treat the city'€™s garbage.

University of Indonesia environmental engineering expert Gabriel Andari Kristanto said that 60 percent of garbage in Jakarta was organic. '€œIf the city administration wants to decrease the volume, how many burners will the incinerator need to burn the trash?'€ she said, adding that the garbage was also wet.

Gabriel also warned that if the garbage was not disaggregated well, the city should pay extra attention to the exhaust gas. '€œWe need to ensure there is a device to control the exhaust gas,'€ she said.

According to her, 17 percent of Jakarta'€™s garbage consists of plastic. '€œIt needs to be burned at a minimum 1,000 degrees Celsius so as to not produce hazardous substances,'€ she said, adding that the hazardous substances included dioxin and furan.

The expert also questioned whether an incinerator was economically prudent for the city budget. '€œWe need fuel to burn the garbage. Is it economically wise to do so?'€ she said.

The same sentiment was delivered by Margaretha Quina, a researcher with the Indonesian Center for Environmental Law (ICEL), who said that the characteristics of waste in Jakarta were not suitable for incinerators using thermal methods to treat garbage.

'€œOur garbage is too moist. The garbage needs to burn perfectly to create energy,'€ she said.

Margaretha said that Indonesia also had the National Appropriate Mitigation Action (Namas), a set of policies and actions the country was required to undertake as part of its commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

'€œNamas'€™ recommends waste treatment focusing on sanitary landfills, treatment at the source of garbage, recycling and a waste-to-energy project using non-thermal technology such as gasification.

The researcher also delivered her concerns over the level of dioxin in Indonesia, which is seven times higher than that in the US.

'€œThe level was measured in 2014 when forest fires had not started and the ITF had not been built,'€ she said.

The city administration aims to reduce its dependence on the Bantar Gebang landfill in Bekasi to handle the city'€™s 6,700 tons of daily garbage.

The ITF project in Sunter was initiated by former governor Fauzi Bowo. However, the execution was tardy due to bureaucracy and tender-related issues.

Jakarta Sanitation Agency head Isnawa Adji said previously that the winner of the tender would be announced soon and that the groundbreaking was expected to be held in February or March.

Twelve environmental organizations jointly declared in December that a waste treatment plant using thermal technology or an incinerator was a waste of energy and a reckless way to treat garbage. The declaration was made in response to a statement by President Joko '€œJokowi'€ Widodo on easing permit issuance procedures for waste to energy (W2E) investors.

Dedy Setiono of the sanitation agency, a bidding committee member of the ITF project, said that the decision to use an incinerator was based on a study conducted a year prior to the initiation of the project in 2011.

Dedy said an incinerator was considered the most suitable technology for the ITF in Sunter, where the land on which is sits measures 4.5 hectares.

'€œThe technology was also not expensive. It was around Rp 1.3 trillion [US$93.6 million] in 2011,'€ he said.

Dedy said as the tender was ongoing, it would be impossible to change the technology of the garbage treatment plant.

'€œThe concept is waste to energy. It will produce up to 14 Megawatts with a capacity of 1,000 tons,'€ he said.

Regarding the unsafe residue, Dedy said the city administration would ensure that the garbage burned at up to 1,000 degrees Celsius. '€œThe contractor will be also obliged to install a gas exhaust control device,'€ he said, adding that the gas released to open air would be safe.

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.

Share options

Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!

Change text size options

Customize your reading experience by adjusting the text size to small, medium, or large—find what’s most comfortable for you.

Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone

Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!

Continue in the app

Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.