TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

Drinkable water: Mission impossible?

The nation’s media, including The Jakarta Post, have reported widely on Indonesia scrubbing the “world’s dirtiest river”

Yuli Suharnoto (The Jakarta Post)
Bogor, West Java
Sat, March 24, 2018

Share This Article

Change Size

Drinkable water: Mission impossible?

T

he nation’s media, including The Jakarta Post, have reported widely on Indonesia scrubbing the “world’s dirtiest river”. Jakarta is stepping in with a seemingly impossible goal: make the Citarum River’s water drinkable by 2025.

Is this mission impossible? As they say, maybe yes, maybe no. In following the momentum generated by World Water Day on March 22, we could learn from the United States.

In 1972, the US passed the Clean Water Act to deal with its water quality problem. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) became responsible for ensuring that all US waters were “fishable” and “swimmable” by 1983, 10 years after the act’s passage. Then in 1992, the EPA issued regulations to establish the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL).

The TMDL is like a pollution budget for a body of water: All sources of a pollutant are identified, and each source is assigned a maximum amount of the pollutant it is allowed to release. Regulations require that the public be involved in developing TMDLs.

Local residents sometimes know more about what is happening in their watersheds than state agencies. Residents can thus offer insights about their community that may ensure the success of one pollutant reduction strategy over another, which can ultimately accelerate cleaning of impaired waters or secure protection for threatened waters.

The US experience shows that local watershed communities play a critical role in educating stakeholders, generating funding and initiating projects to reduce sources of pollution in implementing TMDL.

This approach can be adopted for the Citarum River, because the major sources of pollutants in the river are domestic and municipal activities. A 2014 report by the Asia Development Bank on downstream impacts of water pollution in the upper Citarum revealed that 64 percent of the biological oxygen demand (BOD) in the Citarum derives from domestic and municipal activities, compared with 36 percent from combined industrial and agricultural activities. The BOD is a critical index to assess the effect of discharged wastewater on the immediate environment. The significant number of people lacking access to improved sanitation in the upper Citarum river basin explains the relatively high contribution of pollutants from domestic and municipal activities: 60 percent in rural areas and 35 percent in urban areas.

Thus, one root of the Citarum issue is human activities, especially those of the poor whose access to clean water and sanitation is relatively limited and costly, particularly the urban poor. Thus, poor residents must be involved in overcoming the sanitation problem.

As in managing irrigation water, the key to success has been to work with the people, as experts have confirmed. For instance in Japan, social sanctions are an effective way to secure irrigation water in rural areas. When someone is found to be tapping irrigation water illegally, eight of the individual’s 10 community rights will be stripped in a custom known as hachibun (eight parts), according to Gyozo Ohashi of Ehime University. The two remaining rights are community assistance in the event of a house fire or when the individual dies.

The same scenario is also found in San Antonio, Texas. Long before European settlers arrived there, the Native America community of Texas Hill Country burned the recharge area of the springs annually to prevent trees from growing. A recharge area is where water is able to seep into the ground to refill an aquifer. If the recharge area is not burned, trees like mountain cedar (Juniperus ashei), a drought-tolerant evergreen tree, will grow wildly like it is today.

According to Clyde Munster of Texas A&M University’s Brush Control Project, it was feared that the roots of trees like the mountain cedar, which can reach 6 meters deep, would absorb more water when the water was needed to transfer moisture from the earth to the atmosphere through evaporation and transpiration from plants. By burning the area, only grasses with roots of up to 40 centimeters would grow. Therefore, water loss through evapotranspiration would decrease, making more water available in the springs.

I recently attended research collaboration meetings of a water cluster group at Monash University in Australia that involved Monash, the Bogor Institute of Agriculture (IPB) and the University of Indonesia (UI). The group involves researchers in related disciplines, including politics, law, economics, sociology, urban planning, architecture, landscape architecture, civil engineering, hydrology, water resources, soil sciences and forestry.

The research focus is to develop a “leapfrogging strategy” for the West Java city of Bogor to become a water sensitive city (WSC), and it involves the community, local government, the business community and academia.. Australia’s Cooperative Research Center developed the WSC concept, led by Tony Wong, to promote cities to be livable, resilient, sustainable and productive.

According to experts, including Prof. Wong, most cities will develop step by step from being a water supply city to being a sewered city, then a drained city, waterways city and a water cycle city to ultimately become a water sensitive city. A water supply city is one still struggling with its water supply, while a drained city is one that still struggles with floods.

Thus, to avoid the developmental experiences of Australian cities, we could simply “leapfrog” our cities to be water sensitive, where water supply, sewer and drainage infrastructure are integrated as early as possible.

To make the Citarum water drinkable by 2025, involving the local community will be key. Using the TMDL approach to control the pollution budget, combined with an effort to provide equitable access to clean water and sanitation such as in the WSC approach, we can apply a “leapfrogging” strategy to develop the roadmap for improving the Citarum’s water quality.

Raymond Meredith Belbin, a British researcher and management theorist best known for his work on management teams, famously said: “Nobody is perfect, but a team can be.” Let us prove this by working together to clean up the Citarum River.
______________________________

The writer is a faculty member in the Civil and Environmental Engineering School at the Bogor Institute of Agriculture (IPB), and a deputy leader for mainstreaming climate change on the integrated water resources management team in the Citarum river basin.

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.