TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

What Meiliana said similar to Kalla's statement, says rights group

Karina M. Tehusijarana (The Jakarta Post)
Jakarta
Thu, August 23, 2018

Share This Article

Change Size

What Meiliana said similar to Kalla's statement, says rights group Tanjungbalai resident Meliana has been found guilty of blasphemy after complaining about the volume of the adzan (Muslim call to prayer). (ANTARA FOTO/Septianda Perdana)

T

he Anti-Discrimination Struggle Movement (GANDI) is the latest rights group to condemn the blasphemy conviction of Meiliana, a Buddhist resident of Tanjung Balai, North Sumatra, for complaining about the volume of the adzan (Muslim call to prayer). 

The Medan District Court found Meiliana, 44, guilty of blasphemy under Articles 156 and 156a of the Criminal Code on Tuesday and sentenced her to 18 months in prison. 

She reportedly said the adzan was too loud and hurt her ears in July 2016, triggering an anti-Chinese riot in which offended Muslims torched several Buddhist temples in Tanjung Balai.

GANDI secretary-general Ahmad Ari Masyhuri said Meiliana’s statement was far from the definition of blasphemy in the criminal code, likening it to a statement made by Vice President Jusuf Kalla about the volume of mosques’ loudspeakers.

Kalla, who is also head of the Indonesia Mosque Council, criticized the excessive volume of some mosques’ speakers in 2015, saying that the noise disturbed both Muslims and non-Muslims.

“Looking at the statement that Meiliana is accused of making, in substance there is no difference in what the head of the Indonesian Mosque Council, Vice President Jusuf Kalla, once said,” Ari said in a statement on Thursday. “So, which part is blasphemous?”

Ari called on the government and the House of Representatives to quickly revise the blasphemy laws, saying that they were too open to interpretation. 

“It is too risky for such a diverse nation to be mired in blasphemy articles that can be interpreted in so many ways,” he said.

Rights advocacy group the Setara Institute agreed, adding that President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo’s administration had failed to act firmly against intolerance over the past four years.

“Instead of taking real action to guarantee the freedom of religion, Jokowi has only disbanded organizations like Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia, more for political reasons rather than genuinely defending religious freedom,” the institute’s chairman, Hendardi, said in a statement. (swd)

 

{

Your Opinion Counts

Your thoughts matter - share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.