TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

National scene: Case review of former IM2 director begins

The former director of PT Indosat Mega Media (IM2), Indar Atmanto, who was convicted for corruption, attended the first hearing of his case review on Monday at the Central Jakarta District Court

The Jakarta Post
Jakarta
Wed, March 25, 2015 Published on Mar. 25, 2015 Published on 2015-03-25T06:01:25+07:00

Change text size

Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone

Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
National scene: Case review of former IM2 director begins

T

he former director of PT Indosat Mega Media (IM2), Indar Atmanto, who was convicted for corruption, attended the first hearing of his case review on Monday at the Central Jakarta District Court.

In 2013, Indar was found guilty of enriching the company by misusing the 2.1 gigahertz telecommunication frequency and was sentenced to four years in prison. Indar was also told to pay Rp 200 million, or face an additional three months in prison.

He presented three new pieces of evidence in an effort to prove he had not broken the law or caused state losses.

'€œThe result of the [Communications and Information Ministry'€™s] monitoring agency shows there are no complaints or reports on [the company'€™s] intervention in the use of the 2.1 GHz Indosat frequency from 2006 until now,'€ Indar said in the hearing on Tuesday as quoted by detik.com.

He also cited several weaknesses in the 2013 verdict delivered by the Jakarta Corruption Court.

The case revolves around allegations filed in 2011 by Indonesian Telecommunication Consumer (KTI), an NGO. The chairman of KTI, Denny AK, is serving a prison sentence for extorting parent company Indosat last year.

The Attorney General'€™s Office (AGO) processed the case and launched its prosecution last year, arguing that IM2 had operated illegally by failing to secure frequency licenses based on a regulation issued by the Communications and Information Ministry that barred telecommunication firms from giving frequency allocations to other companies.

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.

Share options

Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!

Change text size options

Customize your reading experience by adjusting the text size to small, medium, or large—find what’s most comfortable for you.

Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone

Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!

Continue in the app

Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.