TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

Climate disaster and land-use change: Reversing insurance business logic

On fire: A National Disaster Mitigation Agency water-bombing helicopter douses a fire in the Merapi Ungup-Ungup conservation area in Banyuwangi, East Java, on Oct

Rivani Noor (The Jakarta Post)
Jakarta
Thu, March 12, 2020

Share This Article

Change Size

Climate disaster and land-use change: Reversing insurance business logic

O

n fire: A National Disaster Mitigation Agency water-bombing helicopter douses a fire in the Merapi Ungup-Ungup conservation area in Banyuwangi, East Java, on Oct. 10, 2019. Disasters cost the country Rp 22 trillion (US$1.57 billion) annually, according to the government.(Antara/Budi Candra Setya)

Over the last few months, we have seen news spreading of natural disasters in both Indonesia and other regions of the planet. Two major countries, the United States and Australia, not only have been hit by fierce storms but also have seen widespread forest fires as a result of the worst-ever heat waves in their histories.

Indonesia itself has seen more floods and landslides happening in shorter cycles. The Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics Agency has statistically analyzed risk changes and chances of rainfall for a period of 150 years. The result shows that Jakarta will see an increase in rainfall of 23 percent. In the past, extreme rainfall used to happen within a period of 10 to 20 years, but it now comes in shorter intervals. The temperature in Indonesia in the last 30 years has also increased by 0.1 to 1 degree Celsius.

In his The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming, David Wallace-Wells noted that an increase of 1 degree Celsius in temperature would cost temperate countries like the US about 1 percent of their gross domestic product. With a 3.7 degree increase, the loss might cost US$551 trillion, far exceeding the total wealth of the world at around $280 trillion. Imagine an increase of 4 degrees! This climate disruption impacts the macro and global economy, not only human lives and local economic traditions. Not only does it undermine economic growth but it is also likely to push the economic curve into extinction.

This is a climate disaster, not just natural and common one, and is the fruit of a prolonged process of structural and cultural activities. In oceanologist Wally Broecker’s words, humans are creating a “war machine” that is increasingly detrimental from day to day.

Professor Peter Hope of Munich Re, an insurance giant with a comprehensive database of natural disasters across the globe, observed that storms and floods have tripled since 1980. These disasters have caused disruption to the global food market in the last five years. Munich Re had to pay $224 billion of insurance claims after earthquakes and tsunamis hit Japan in 2011. Similarly, Allianz had to pay $843 billion of claims that drastically cut its profit by 44 percent.

America’s insurance companies paid a total of $130 billion of insurance claims following three consecutive big hurricanes in 2005: Katrina, Rita and Wilma. In addition, the December 2018 hailstorm in Sydney, although only lasting for a day, cost Australia’s insurance companies A$412.5 million from 25,000 claims.

The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) said that the hailstorm was the fifth disaster to hit the country in 2018. Previously in March that year, forest fires broke out in New South Wales and Victoria, resulting in insurance claims of $82.5 million. A storm in Queensland as well as another storm and a flood in Hobart led to insurance claims standing at $62 million and $99.6 million, respectively. The amount will get much higher if we also include claims over forest fires that were raging in Australia until early 2020.

How about Indonesia? Finance Minister Sri Mulyani Indrawati said disasters cost the country Rp 22 trillion ($1.57 billion) annually, quite an enormous amount compared with the average annual budget of provinces in Sumatra. While the insurance claims for climate disaster have yet to be thoroughly compiled, the General Insurance Association of Indonesia has estimated a one-digit increase for 2020.

As a business entity providing coverage, in the form of compensation resulting from loss, damages, injury, treatment or hardship, insurance companies need to start considering climate disruption a challenge their business has to address. It is believed that in the next few years we’ll see an increase in insurance claims of various types: physical damages and loss, health care, death and accidents, which are all caused by extreme weather resulting from climate change.

In the context of Indonesia, climate change has been driven by deforestation and degradation. Globally, these two drivers are the world’s fourth-biggest carbon emitters at 17 percent (IPCC; 2007). For Indonesia, home to the world’s third-largest tropical forests and world’s second-largest peatland, this has become particularly relevant and important as both account for 60 percent of Indonesia’s carbon emissions, according to the Environment and Forestry Ministry.

At the site level, deforestation and degradation are driven by inconsistent land governance, which has led to, among other issues, agrarian conflicts. According to the ministry’s Conflict Resolution, Tenure and Customary Forest Directorate General, there were 136 agrarian-related conflicts in 2019. Most initiatives to combat deforestation and degradation have yet to show achievements as agrarian conflicts have not been addressed well. For example, when a fire starts in any given forest area, the fire-extinguishing efforts come very slowly as no party feels accountable.

It’s time for insurance business entities to consider climate change in their risk management, including in mapping its fundamental driver, i.e. land-use change. Referring to the increasing insurance claims, these entities should design their business plans to no longer focus on managing clients’ risks but those of the driver. A good business strategy is one that minimizes factors that make the business inefficient and less profitable, isn’t it?

A number of Scandinavian financial corporations, including insurance companies, have developed safeguard policies for their financial investment business. The policies include respect for human rights (including non-violent conflict resolution), no deforestation and no degradation of peatland.

They have not been implemented well, but at least efforts have been made as climate change has never been this obvious. It no longer happens somewhere out there, but here, in “our home”.

______

Advisory expert to the environment and forestry minister in the field of agrarian conflicts and mediation. This views expressed are his own.

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.