Without ASEAN, countries of Southeast Asia could remain pawns in the proxy rivalries of extra-regional major powers.
ithout hesitation: ASEAN has mattered. Absent ASEAN, countries in Southeast Asia could have continued to be encumbered by deep divisions, distrust and animosity.
Without ASEAN, countries of Southeast Asia could remain pawns in the proxy rivalries of extra-regional major powers.
And a Southeast Asia without A SEAN could have only too easily followed cycles of conflictsunder development-political upheavals.
Challenges to ASEAN’s unity have been well reported. Yet ASEAN has demonstrated its resilience. Ultimately, ASEAN has proven indispensable.
ASEAN’s contributions have been nothing less than transformative. “Strategic trust” has replaced the trust deficits once common in relations among countries of Southeast Asia.
ASEAN “centrality” in the wider region’ s political-security and economic architecturebuilding has usurped the vision of an inconsequential Southeast Asia locked in divisive major power rivalries.
And optimism of economic promise abound in contrast to the challenges of decades past. In keeping with its people-centered promise, ASEAN has taken up respect for, and promotion of, human rights and democratic principles as key goals.
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.
Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.