As President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo runs for a second term, his critics are accusing him of misusing state facilities to boost his image.
s President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo runs for a second term, his critics are accusing him of misusing state facilities to boost his image. His opponents and the public have pointed out various instances, ranging from public service announcements by the Communications and Information Ministry that showcased development progress made under the administration, to his plan to disburse funds to subdistricts across Indonesia during election year, which opponents believe to be politically motivated.
Where do we draw the line between an incumbent’s strategic advantage and abuse of power? When do otherwise “normal” day-to-day official visits and state programs become a hidden campaign?
Admittedly, the issue of hidden campaigning applies not only to incumbents, but also to other candidates. Of late, there have been concerns over candidates visiting pesantren (Islamic boarding schools) and other institutions where campaigning is banned, arguing that such visits are not related to their campaign.
However, the distinct problem with incumbents lies in the risk of state facilities and authorities being abused for their benefit.
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.