TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

KPK to present evidence during Setya's pretrial hearing

Kharishar Kahfi (The Jakarta Post)
Jakarta
Mon, September 25, 2017

Share This Article

Change Size

KPK to present evidence during Setya's pretrial hearing Combating graft: Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) spokesperson Febri Diansyah (left), together with Supreme Audit Agency (BPK) spokesman Yudi Ramdan Budiman, gives a press statement on a graft case implicating a BPK auditor at the antigraft body’s headquarters in Jakarta on Sept. 22. (Antara/Hafidz Mubarak A.)

T

he Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) plans to present evidence related to the high-profile electronic identity (e-ID) graft case implicating House of Representatives Speaker Setya Novanto during a pretrial hearing at the South Jakarta District Court on Monday.

Setya filed a pretrial motion with the court to challenge the KPK's move to name the Golkar Party chairman a suspect.

The antigraft body's legal representatives in the hearing are set to bring more than 200 documents, which they claim will support the KPK's decision to name Setya as a suspect.

"These documents will provide the construction of the case, including indications of Setya's alleged roles [in the case]," KPK spokesman Febri Diansyah said in a statement on Sunday.

Read also: Doctor allows KPK to question Setya Novanto

On Friday, Cepi Iskandar, the single judge in the hearing, rejected an objection raised by the KPK in which the antigraft body argued that Setya’s questioning of the status of the antigraft body’s investigators was invalid.

KPK legal bureau head Setiadi said that Setya’s legal team should have questioned the status of the commission’s investigators at the Jakarta Administrative Court, not by means of a pretrial motion.

But the judge said the status of KPK investigators, which had been questioned by Setya and his legal team, was not related to civil service-related administrative disputes, thus Setya's claim was relevant to the pretrial motion. (bbs)

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.