Jakarta Post

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post
press enter to search

The Jakarta Post
Video Weather icon 30°C
DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
30°C Partly Cloudy

Dry and mostly cloudy throughout the day.

  • Wed

    26℃ - 32℃

  • Thu

    25℃ - 32℃

  • Fri

    25℃ - 31℃

  • Sat

    26℃ - 30℃

Umar Patek’s trial seemingly goes nowhere

  • Rabby Pramudatama

    The Jakarta Post

Jakarta | Tue, March 20 2012 | 10:00 am
Umar Patek’s trial  seemingly goes nowhere

Umar Patek: The country’s most wanted terrorist was smiling in his trial. Kompas.com/Roderick Adrian Mozes

More than two months after the start of the trial of one of the country’s most wanted terrorist, Umar Patek, nicknamed the Demolition Man, the court proceedings have failed to pick up steam.

On Monday, prosecutors presented six witnesses who gave sketchy accounts of Patek’s alleged role in a number of terror attacks that rocked the country in recent years.

Patek is accused of masterminding the 2002 Bali bombing, which killed more than 200 people, mostly foreign holidaymakers. He is also accused of assembling explosives that were used in bombings in nine cities on Christmas Eve 2000.

The six witnesses, all victims of the Bali bombing, testified before a panel of judges presided over by Lexsy Mamonto.

“At the time of the blast, I was near the bombing site [on Jl. Legian, Bali] to buy rice. I saw a man get out of a parked white car blocking the road outside Paddy’s,” one of the witnesses, Khusnul Khotimah, told the court on Monday.

One of the two bombs in the attack was inside a white Mitsubishi L-300 van on Jl. Legian outside Paddy’s and Sari nightclubs.

“I did not see the man’s face, but I don’t think his description matches that of the defendant,” she added.

Another witness, I Gusti Ngurah Anom, said he had testified in the trial of other terror suspects of the Bali bombing, but he had not heard Patek’s name mentioned during court proceedings.

“I learned that the defendant was one of Bali bombing suspects from media reports,” Gusti said in response to questions from one of Patek’s attorneys.

The team of prosecutors led by Bambang Suharyadi asked only about Anom’s experience during the blast, how badly he had been affected and the material losses he suffered.

Other witnesses, Tumini, Jatmiko and Gatot, all gave similar accounts of the devastating impacts of the blast.

Patek’s attorney Asrudin Habjani said after the hearing that the witnesses could only confirm that the blast had happened but could not pinpoint Patek’s role in the attack.

“I guess we have to wait for the next hearing to get incriminating evidence against my client,” he said.

On March 12, four victims of the Christmas Eve bombings testified against Patek.

The witnesses were security guards Wagyono, Sugiono and Abdul Jami and police officer Iteng Waluyo.

The only useful information against Patek that the court gleaned was the testimony of two convicts of the Christmas Eve bombings, Edy Setiono and Abdul Jabar.

The two convicts said that Patek set the timers on the bombs.

Edy said that Dulmatin, another terror suspect who was shot dead by police in Pamulang, South Tangerang, in 2010, had introduced him to Patek.

Abdul, however, voiced doubt that Patek was the mastermind of the bombing.

Patek was considered a key figure of Jemaah Islamiyah, a Southeast Asian terror network believed to be linked to al-Qaeda.

He was captured on Jan. 25, 2011, in Abbottabad, Pakistan, and extradited to Indonesia on Aug. 11, 2011.

While on run, Patek was wanted by the US, Australia and Indonesia. He had a US$1 million bounty on his head under the US government’s “Rewards for Justice” program.

His trial was adjourned until Thursday.


Join the discussions