TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

Live-in rule for HK domestic helpers under scrutiny

The high-profile case of foreigner domestic helper (FDH) Erwiana Sulistyaningsih has led to criticism of the mandatory live-in policy for FDHs

Shadow Li (The Jakarta Post)
Hong Kong
Thu, February 12, 2015

Share This Article

Change Size

Live-in rule for HK domestic helpers under scrutiny

T

he high-profile case of foreigner domestic helper (FDH) Erwiana Sulistyaningsih has led to criticism of the mandatory live-in policy for FDHs.

But academics and an employers'€™ group expressed reservations about abandoning the policy.

FDH groups, assisting Erwiana in the legal battle against her abusive employer, blamed government policies, including mandatory live-in arrangements, for exposing domestic helpers to the risk of violence.

Cynthia Abdon-Tellez, general manager of Mission for Migrant Workers, said Erwiana was the victim of Hong Kong government'€™s unjust policies such as mandatory live-in arrangements. She said this put migrant worker at risk of abuse.

However, academics and an employers'€™ group disagreed. Professor of Sociology at the Chinese University of Hong Kong Stephen Chiu Wing-kai said cancelling the live-in policy would reduce families'€™ desire to hire domestic helpers.

Chiu said that without the live-in policy, Hong Kong family'€™s dependence on domestic helpers would drop. 

Support Group for HK Employers with FDH convener Joan Tsui Hui-tung also expressed strong objections to removing the mandatory live-in policy.

Tsui said ending these arrangements would hurt families with children. This was because most parents have to work until 8pm in the city.

'€œIf the domestic helpers were not there to take care of children before parents return home, then what'€™s the point of hiring helpers?'€ said Tsui.

Tsui also expressed concern over increased fees for employers if FDHs were allowed to live off-site. With current rent levels, the employer has to pay another HK$4,000 (US$516) to subsidise a helper'€™s rent. This could raise the total cost of hiring a domestic helper to around HK$10,000 (US$1,300).

According to the Immigration Department, Hong Kong had about 330,650 domestic helpers living in the city by the end of 2014 - 5.8 per cent higher than at the end of 2012. If they were all allowed to live off-site, it could send already exorbitant rents to a higher level, said Tsui.

Professor Leung Cho-bun from Department of Social Work and Social Administration at the University of Hong Kong didn'€™t seem to be optimistic about the idea of allowing FDHs to live off-site.

There is no clear evidence suggesting that the live-in policy was the cause of FDH abuse and living off-site would not reduce conflict, explained Leung.

He said the current mechanism was sufficient to deal with such crimes.

Still, Leung suggested FDH agents should conduct call-back interviews on families and helpers from time to time. This would help monitor the situation and prevent conflict.

The Labour Department said the live-in arrangement was a cornerstone of Hong Kong'€™s FDH policy.

A department spokeswoman said the policy was there to protect local labourers. The department believes it is necessary to maintain the mandatory live-in arrangements considering all the risks. (***)

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.