TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Ahok verdict irregular: Setara
Setara calls it a trial by the mob, which is actually against the rule of law.
Change Size
Jakarta Governor Basuki "Ahok" Tjahaja Purnama waves upon arriving at the Cipinang Detention Center in East Jakarta on Tuesday. (Antara/Ubaidillah)
T
he North Jakarta District Court’s decision to sentence Basuki “Ahok” Tjahaja Purnama to two years’ imprisonment is irregular because the sentence is longer than that demanded by prosecutors, rights group Setara Institute has said.
Ahok was initially charged under Article 156a of the Criminal Code (KUHP) on blasphemy and Article 156 of the KUHP on defaming clergymen. Prosecutors, however, later dropped the blasphemy charge and demanded that Ahok be sentenced to two years’ probation and one year in prison if he reoffended.
(Read also: 10,000 balloons for Ahok ahead of verdict announcement)
“Judges are indeed independent but they must base verdicts on facts and evidence. The weak evidence presented by prosecutors should have been able to convince the judges to hand down a lighter sentence than that demanded by prosecutors,” Setara chairman Hendari said in a statement.
“The verdict has proved the blasphemy article is prone to misuse by certain parties,” he added.
Hendari said the judges seemed to have been working under pressure amid the waves of protesters demanding Ahok be imprisoned. "It was a trial by the mob, which is actually against the rule of law."
He also said the judicial system seemed to be influenced by public pressure.
“In legal principle, if judges hesitate in deciding something, they should choose the most favorable option for the defendants,” Hendardi said. (bbs)
