Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

Reforming logistics system

  • Editorial Board

    The Jakarta Post

Jakarta   /   Thu, August 27, 2020   /   08:44 am
Reforming logistics system Indonesia’s national logistics system remains more inefficient and costlier than its neighbors like Malaysia, Thailand, Singapore and India, according to the World Bank. (Shutterstock/Pressmaster)

The President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo government has been prioritizing since 2014 the development of basic infrastructure like roads, seaports, airports, telecommunications and irrigation as one of its top priority programs. The 2021 state budget allocates Rp 414 trillion (US$28.5 billion) for infrastructure development, up 47 percent from this year’s budget.

The primary objective is quite strategic: to improve interisland connectivity in the world’s largest archipelagic country and thereby enhance integration of the domestic market and reduce economic disparities between the major islands.

Another equally important objective is to connect the archipelago’s various economic growth centers to the global value chain to make the country more attractive to foreign manufacturing investors.

Unfortunately, Indonesia’s national logistics system remains more inefficient and costlier than its neighbors like Malaysia, Thailand, Singapore and India, according to the World Bank.

What’s the problem?

The improvements in geographical connectivity have not been adequately supported by improved interinstitutional connectivity. Put another way, the flow of documents from state agencies and companies involved in logistics management is not in synch with the flow of goods.

The government has therefore developed what it calls the national logistics ecosystem (NLE), an electronic data interchange (EDI) that will enable all authorities and players (the customs office, airport and seaport operators, traders, shipping companies, freight forwarders, and other logistics companies) to exchange data for both domestic and international trade.

The 474-page 2021 state budget devotes one page to explaining the NLE, but provides no technical details like which government institution is responsible for implementing the ecosystem. But we assume the customs directorate general will manage the NLE, given its central role in trade.

The NLE will allow all institutions and companies involved in transporting goods a single “portal” to submit and share both data and documents. Hence, instead of submitting a variety of different forms and information in multiple copies to numerous agencies, a trader or shipper need only supply all information to a single institution that acts as a single billing agency and gateway for all major ports.

Many other countries that have implemented an EDI have been able to expedite customs clearance and all other required document processing for both domestic and international trade and transport, including port handling, so they are completed in just a few hours as opposed to the several days it takes in Indonesia.

Introducing the NLE certainly necessitates bold bureaucratic and administrative reform at the more than 20 government institutions and private companies involved in the logistics industry. But then again, radical reform is never easy because it challenges the rent-seeking mentality that has been nurtured by an outdated system that involves too many institutions and too many procedural steps.

But we believe this far-reaching reform is as important as the massive infrastructure development agenda. Without it, our logistics system will remain a major barrier to domestic and international trade and investment — never mind the pandemic economy.