TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Developers push back against plan to raise landed house tax
Real Estate Indonesia (REI) has suggested that the government address structural issues plaguing high-rise living instead, ranging from unrealistic pricing benchmarks to frequent conflicts in poorly managed apartment communities.
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
New build: A subsidized housing complex is seen from above on Aug. 1, 2024, at Puuwatu district in Kendari, Southeast Sulawesi. (Antara/Andry Denisah)
P
roperty developers have voiced opposition to the government’s plan to increase taxes on landed houses in urban areas, a move aimed at encouraging people to shift toward high-rise living.
The Real Estate Indonesia (REI) association warned the policy would further strain an already sluggish property sector grappling with weak consumer spending power.
“We are surprised. When the property industry is underperforming, it is unwise to impose a new tax burden on landed homeowners,” REI deputy chairman Bambang Ekajaya said on Sunday, as quoted by Kontan.
Bambang cautioned that the plan could derail the government’s goal of addressing the national housing backlog, which currently stands at around 15 million units.
He pointed out that many of the subsidized homes offered through the government’s Housing Finance Liquidity Facility (FLPP) were, in fact, landed houses.
If the government wants to promote high-rise living, Bambang added, it should first address the structural issues plaguing the sector, ranging from unrealistic pricing benchmarks to frequent conflicts in poorly managed apartment communities.
“Private developers have largely steered clear of government-subsidized urban apartments because the cost of construction exceeds the benchmark selling price,” he explained.
