Irshad Manji , New York | Thu, 08/28/2008 10:08 AM | Opinion
In the coming weeks, Americans will focus on who should lead the "land of the free and home of the brave." But does the United States still deserve to be described in the language of conscience and courage? It's increasingly questionable.
Random House, among the top publishers in New York, has canceled The Jewel of Medina, an historical novel about the Prophet Muhammad's second and youngest wife, A'isha. Their reason: It might incite a violent backlash.
Might? That's all it takes these days? According to whom?
Welcome to where things get interesting. Long before controversy arose, Random House sent an endorsement request to Denise Spellberg, a non-Muslim professor at the University of Texas. She found parts of the manuscript offensive and decided that Muslims should feel the same.
Reportedly judging the book to be "national security threat," she depicted it as "more dangerous than the Satanic Verses." Prof. Spellberg ought to know: She teaches Salman Rushdie's notorious novel in her class. Clearly, she doesn't back censorship.
Yet her lawyer warned Random House not to use Prof. Spellberg's name in or on the novel.
Random House then consulted more "scholars of Islam." In effect, the publisher invited post-colonial theorists with narrow specializations to rip apart a mass-market story. Also pulled in was the corporation's head of security.
Meanwhile, a listserv of graduate students in Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies learned of the still-unpublished novel. They heard about it through a Muslim website manager who claims to have received a "frantic" call from Prof. Spellberg. His postings got forwarded to various forums, ultimately reaching a blogger who circulated a protest strategy.
There's no evidence that anybody paid serious attention to the blogger's plan. Despite the resounding lack of threats, however, Random House announced that it would postpone publication for the sake of safety -- including that of the author, Sherry Jones.
Mind you, she's free to seek a fatwa: Random House has now terminated Jones' contract so she may sell the manuscript elsewhere. "We stand firmly by our responsibility to support our authors," its corporate statement reads. That's one way to prove it.
How to begin unraveling the absurdity of this decision? For starters, Random House is in the business of free expression. Of course, so are newspapers and most of them didn't print the Danish cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad.
But this novel can't be compared to those cartoons. The Jewel of Medina treats both the Prophet and his bride with deep affection. My own conversation with Jones affirms her respect for the dignity of A'isha.
"I wrote Jewel, in part, because I recognize the absence of women's voices in the way Islamic history is told," she explained by phone. "Women played a huge leadership role in the founding of the faith. Silencing my voice only achieves more silencing of theirs."
Thus another absurdity. The muzzling of Sherry Jones originated with a woman. Moreover, Denise Spellberg is non-Muslim. Why are there no cries of interference, imperialism, even racism from those who typically tell non-Muslims to stay out of Islamic issues?
Such cries are necessary because the cancellation of this book amounts to a curious form of racism. Random House New York has revealed what low expectations it has of Muslims. Self-censorship reduces all believers to the status of children, incapable of handling sensitive material with civility. As a believer, I'm offended.
All Muslims aren't infants. The man who took Prof. Spellberg's call insists he never wanted Jones gagged. Self-censorship does no favors to the Muslim community, he asserts, because "we're not going to silence our way out of problems."
In Serbia, where the novel is already out, some Muslims have indeed complained, prompting the publisher to apologize and stop sales. But a high-ranking Muslim cleric has defended the book's publication. Bosnian Muslims have also taken freedom's side, persuading testy muftis to remember the alternative: Slobodan Milosevic.
In the West, publishers aren't haunted by the legacy of Milosevic. What they fear are replays of Rushdie. I experienced this first-hand when my own book, which advocates reform of Muslims, landed on the desks of British publishers. Some suggested that my name would be too exotic for multicultural England. The honest ones mumbled Rushdie's name. About fourty rejections arrived before a small Scottish company offered to publish.
While some know the price of free expression, others know the value of it. Indonesia, the world's largest Muslim country, has just launched the book to wide acclaim. My Canadian publisher even allows me to post free-of-charge translations on the Internet for readers in the Islamic world, where the book is widely banned. So far, there have been more than 500,000 downloads -- and no deaths.
In the end, Random House New York may have given Sherry Jones the gift of global exposure. We shouldn't be surprised to see The Jewel of Medina distributed far and wide, as it deserves to be. I shall also be recommending her novel to my brave publisher back home. Its name: Random House Canada.
The writer is Director of the Moral Courage Project at New York University. She is author of Faith Without Fear (Beriman Tanpa Rasa Takut), recently released in Indonesia by Nun Publisher and can be reached at bigideas@rogers.com
Reedone (not verified) — Mon, 10/13/2008 - 10:30am
since the widely news on that taken from hadist which was researched 200 years after prophet dies that open for debate of its authenticity, different with qur'an that written when the prophet still alive and combined in one book right after his death (abu bakr) and finished in usman leadership.
here another facts of aisha age when he married her:
A great misconception prevails as to the age at which A’isha was taken in marriage by the Prophet. Ibn Sa‘d has stated in the Tabaqat that when Abu Bakr was approached on behalf of the Holy Prophet, he replied that the girl had already been betrothed to Jubair, and that he would have to settle the matter first with him. This shows that A’isha must have been approaching majority at the time. Again, the Isaba, speaking of the Prophet’s daughter Fatima, says that she was born five years before the Call and was about five years older than A’isha. This shows that A’isha must have been about ten years at the time of her betrothal to the Prophet, and not six years as she is generally supposed to be. This is further borne out by the fact that A’isha herself is reported to have stated that when the chapter entitled The Moon (fifty-fourth chapter) was revealed, she was a girl playing about and remembered certain verses then revealed. Now the fifty-fourth chapter was undoubtedly revealed before the sixth year of the Call. All these considerations point to but one conclusion, viz., that A’isha could not have been less than ten years of age at the time of her nikah, which was virtually only a betrothal. And there is one report in the Tabaqat that A’isha was nine years of age at the time of nikah. Again it is a fact admitted on all hands that the nikah of A’isha took place in the tenth year of the Call in the month of Shawwal, while there is also preponderance of evidence as to the consummation of her marriage taking place in the second year of Hijra in the same month, which shows that full five years had elapsed between the nikah and the consummation. Hence there is not the least doubt that A’isha was at least nine or ten years of age at the time of betrothal, and fourteen or fifteen years at the time of marriage.
Iain Shearer (not verified) — Thu, 08/28/2008 - 2:04pm
A'isha was 6 when they married, and she was 9 when Muhammad consumated the marriage.
Please refer to Bukhari vol.7 book 62 ch.60 no.88 p.65; Sahih Muslim vol.2 book 8 no.3309,3310,3311 p.715,716
Muhammad had 23 wives... and many more concubines.
I'm not surprised Muslims want it banned. The truth hurts.