TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

Big fish do not necessarily eat little fish

In the economic model we see today, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer

Harun Yahya (The Jakarta Post)
Istanbul
Fri, September 30, 2016

Share This Article

Change Size

Big fish do not necessarily eat little fish

I

n the economic model we see today, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Even though economists give different names to the current economic system, it has one base: Social Darwinism. Social Darwinism adheres to the idea that life is a place for struggle and that people are free to do anything to survive and win in this “wild” environment.

Wild capitalism is still apparent today. It employs ruthless methods but its biggest error is that it recognizes no boundaries to the exploitation or elimination of weaker business enterprises or poorer individuals are to be exploited or eliminated. The expression, “the big fish eat the little fish” outlines the situation quite well.

During the 20th century, we encountered two main economic models: the liberal economic model based on private property and free markets and the socialist economic model based on state property and a central planned economy.

While the socialist models failed, and ended up inflicting needless poverty; it was laissez-faire capitalism that brought welfare and success to the common man.

However, free trade alone is insufficient in bringing prosperity to everyone, as the gap between the rich and the poor continues to widen.

To avoid such corruption, governments can and should bring about social reforms and take the necessary precautions to help the poor, the children and the unemployed. Additionally, a spirit of cooperation and solidarity should be strong within societies.

People should approach one another with respect, compassion and mercy regardless of their economic situation instead of considering them as rivals who should be beaten for their own selfish interests.

As its name indicates, Social Darwinism is based on the ideology put forth by Charles Darwin in On the Origins of Species. It was Herbert Spencer, a British intellectual and a fervent supporter of Social Darwinism, who applied Darwin’s notorious argument, “the survival of the fittest” to economic life. This ideology was prevalent in the US during the late 19th and early 20th centuries during the so-called Gilded Age.

Social Darwinism, which was also quite popular among the British elite, extrapolated Darwin’s idea of natural selection and grafted it onto whole societies. As maintained by the proponents of this theory, their immorality was justified by the expanding income inequality.

The founding father of Social Darwinism, Herbert Spencer, embraced the thought that a person becoming poor is his own fault and nobody should help relieve him from such a difficulty.

Similarly, if a person becomes rich, it is his success even if he gained such wealth in unethical ways. Therefore, as expected, the prominent promoters of Social Darwinism were mostly investors.

Through this newly adopted ideology, their dubious ascent in business and society through immoral methods were not denounced because these actions were considered compatible with “scientific accounts” and “the law of nature”.

A quarter century ago, a Darwinian philosopher explained this distorted mindset in an explicit way: “Darwin’s theory does undermine traditional values.

In particular, it undermines the traditional idea that human life has a special, unique worth […] Darwinism undermines both the idea that man is made in the image of God and the idea that man is a uniquely rational being.”

 Today, most societies that adopt such a capitalist system have a tendency to act ruthlessly toward the poor and the needy. Underage children being mercilessly employed in inconvenient jobs in third world countries support many companies to increase their share of wealth, and deprived social rights are very common in such societies.

Similarly, in Victorian era Britain and the US, Darwinism received great admiration and support on account of the advantages it supplied to the ruthless capitalists known as the “robber barons”.

The notion of a “struggle for existence”, which Spencer promoted quite heavily, took various forms in different parts of the world, even resulting in mass killings.

For example, Ernst Haeckel, a German Darwinian biologist, believed Caucasians were superior to blacks and Jews. He was also the first to promote the idea of eugenics, the natural consequence of Darwinism, in Germany.

Haeckel died in 1919 but his views were adopted by Hitler, leading to the establishment of sterilization camps and the deaths of thousands of people who did not belong to the “Aryan race”. It was again the Darwinist system that brought about World War I and II.

After seeing such a dark picture in your minds, I will now speak about the most effective ways to eliminate such an ideology that keeps causing misery to human lives. The primary step to take to prevent such ruthless ideologies, be it communism, or hyper-capitalism, or fascism, is to eliminate the root cause — that is Darwinism, intellectually.

In that respect, the Technics and Science Research Foundation, which I am the honorary president of, carried out a scientific conference recently in Istanbul as a joint event with Christian organization Reasons to Believe. It was a successful scientific meeting amid wars, conflicts, moral collapse, hunger and income inequality in the world today.

The main reason for such misery is the lack of faith in God. Therefore, it is crucial that Muslims, Christians and Jews act together in the intellectual struggle against materialism and atheism.

The current situation demands the immediate formation of such an alliance between the pious people of the divine faiths. A morality based on the belief in God should replace the Darwinian understanding and will solve many of the issues.

Since Social Darwinism promotes the idea of “the big fish eating the little fish”, the elimination of the weak and a ruthless rivalry among people, a morality based on faith in God will nurture mercy, protection, solidarity, cooperation and sharing. We have to keep in mind that the big fish does not necessarily eat the little one, but protects it instead.
__________________________________________

The writer has written books on religion, politics and science.

{

Your Opinion Counts

Your thoughts matter - share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.