TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

Judge rejects Miryam's pretrial motion

The South Jakarta District Court’s sole judge Asiadi Sembiring has rejected a pretrial hearing request filed by Hanura Party lawmaker Miryam S.Haryani to challenge her having been named a suspect in a case of alleged embezzlement involving the e-ID program.

News Desk (The Jakarta Post)
Jakarta
Tue, May 23, 2017 Published on May. 23, 2017 Published on 2017-05-23T14:04:57+07:00

Change text size

Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone

Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Judge rejects Miryam's pretrial motion Suspected: Former Hanura Party lawmaker Miryam S. Haryani arrives at the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) to attend an interrogation about the e-ID graft case on May 19. (Antara/Wahyu Putro A.)

T

he South Jakarta District Court’s sole judge Asiadi Sembiring has rejected a pretrial hearing request filed by Hanura Party lawmaker Miryam S. Haryani to challenge her having been named a suspect in a case of alleged embezzlement involving the e-ID program.

In a hearing on Tuesday, Asiadi said the Corruption Eradication Commission’s (KPK) decision to name Miryam a suspect had been a correct one according to the law.

Miryam was named a suspect of an alleged perjury. She was accused of having given false statements in an e-ID hearing. The KPK used Article 22 of the 2001 Corruption Eradication Law concerning perjury, which carries a maximum sentence of 12 years in prison.

KPK law firm head Setiadi said the judge’s decision showed that the antigraft body was on the right track in determining Miryam’s suspect status.

“He [the judge] rejected the arguments of Miryam’s lawyers who relied on Article 174 concerning perjury of the Criminal Law Procedures [KUHAP],” Setiadi said.

He said the judge’s decision to reject Miryam’s pretrial hearing request was a warning for any witnesses in any corruption case to not give false statements during trials.

Miryam's lawyer Patriani P. Mulia said her team respected the judge's decision and would continue to follow the legal process. (rdi/ebf)

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.

Share options

Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!

Change text size options

Customize your reading experience by adjusting the text size to small, medium, or large—find what’s most comfortable for you.

Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone

Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!

Continue in the app

Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.