TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search results
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsWhy Perppu on mass groups is flawed
Its contents run counter to the fundamental legal principle stipulated in the Constitution.
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia members and sympathizers of Islamic organizations from Greater Jakarta stage a rally to protest the 2017 presidential regulation in lieu of law (Perppu) on Mass Organizations in Jakarta on July 17. (JP/Ibrahim Irsyad)
T
he government finally outlawed on July 20 Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI), an Islamic group deemed by many as radical, because of the conviction that it posed a threat to Pancasila state ideology and the Constitution.
The move followed the issuance of a government regulation in lieu of law (Perppu) that revised Law No. 17/2013 on mass organizations.
Although the government might feel there is an urgency to take action to halt a worrying development of radical groups in Indonesia, it seems it moved too quickly and the policy has created some juridical and philosophical problems.
The main juridical fault with the Perppu is the absence of judicial process prior to the administrative sanction imposed by the government against a group considered to have violated the prescribed law.
