Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsCan't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsAnother author has written an excellent piece on the effects of government price controls on food price stability
nother author has written an excellent piece on the effects of government price controls on food price stability. The core problem is that the government espouses socialist redistribution policies and enacts protectionist laws, while at the same time the laws are drafted to enhance profits of domestic monopolistic positions.
If the government were to allow imports from any country with good food quality standards and leave out the quota garbage, it would be able to import what it cannot produce effectively and focus the national economy on what can be produced more efficiently than by other nations.
This idea is called comparative advantage and it has been shown to increase living standards in countries that follow it, as opposed to reductions of living standards in countries that don't.
As for selecting trading partners to avoid countries you take offense to, this is OK as long as you are willing to make the population pay higher prices.
Removing quotas and allowing business to business trade without the involvement of the trade minister and the State Logistics Agency (Bulog) would allow the market to decide the source of its goods.
If the Australians are too flighty, then the market will turn to Russian or Indian sources as long as they can get the same product at comparable prices.
This is the real issue for Indonesian trade policy, not whether specific trade partners are nice chaps.
Testi
Indonesia might like to get advice from India regarding the adoption of a vegetarian diet. By becoming vegetarian, Indonesia will not need a beef cattle industry.
People can also be encouraged to reduce wheat-based products by the use of substitutes such as tapioca, taro, yam and corn.
This article is in contrast with the opinion presented by the Indonesian Ambassador to Australia Najib Riphat ('Indonesia-Australia relationship will flourish with long-term vision', The Australian, Aug. 17)
Yes, Australia is not a perfect country and its government is certainly not popular, even domestically. But it doesn't mean 'Indonesia is always right' and 'Australia is always wrong' especially when one sees it from a researcher's point of view.
It seems to me that all comments from Pierre were designed to 'please' the sense of nationalism, rather than seeking to present ideas that are truly pertinent to the long-term benefit of Indonesia.
It's like a wise parent who tells his rebellious sons, 'someday, my sons, you will understand why I do this. I do this for your well-being.'
I expected more visionary ideas from the Marthinus Academy, but I realized I was wrong after I read this article.
Djay Subianto
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.
Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.