TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

Forest cover maps to remain confidential: Court

A court verdict has allowed the Indonesian government to not disclose forest cover maps, which are essential in providing greater transparency on forest governance.

Hans Nicholas Jong (The Jakarta Post)
Jakarta
Thu, February 16, 2017

Share This Article

Change Size

Forest cover maps to remain confidential: Court Far and wide: An expedition team for the mapping of the Bukit Gedang communal forest take a rest to enjoy the view. (JP/Syafrizaldi)

T

he State Administrative High Court (PTUN) ruled on Thursday in favor of the Environment and Forestry Ministry, allowing the government to not disclose forest cover maps, which are essential in providing greater transparency on forest governance.

In September 2015, Greenpeace Indonesia filed a lawsuit at the Central Information Commission (KIP) against the ministry for refusing to release various cover maps in shapefile format, which the ministry deems to be confidential documents.

Shapefile format for maps enables users to analyze data by overlaying different maps. It functions to provide greater transparency about who controls areas of land and what happens within those areas.

Last October, the KIP ruled in favor of Greenpeace Indonesia. However, the ministry appealed to the PTUN, which in turn decided that the ministry could keep the documents confidential.

“The future of Indonesia’s forests is getting darker with this ruling. There are many changes within forest areas unknown to the public because the data and information are being kept deliberately by the ministry,” Greenpeace Indonesia forest campaigner Ratri Kusumohartono said.

She said the ruling and the government’s stance meant there was no transparency on forest governance under President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo’s administration.

“This ruling means that there’s less opportunity for the public to participate in preventing deforestation and forest fires. Meanwhile, important data that was requested by Greenpeace Indonesia is key information to knowing the conditions of our forests today,” Ratri said.

Therefore, Greenpeace Indonesia would file a cassation at the Supreme Court. 

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.