The absence of opposition or critical voices in the House of Representatives, or lack thereof, would likely result in a diminished legislative function as well as weaken oversight of the executive branch.

An opinion piece titled “The Crucial Role of Opposition in Safeguarding Democracy”, published on the same day in the Post, underscores the opposition’s vital role in a democratic framework, especially within the legislative branch. It emphasizes that the opposition is crucial in maintaining checks and balances, acting as a safeguard against the concentration of power in the hands of the ruling political party or coalition, thereby preventing the monopolization of authority.

Observing the contemporary political dynamics unfolding in the country, there are at least three key takeaways for the public to consider as part of political awareness.

First, the existence of an opposition encourages in-depth debate and critical discussion, creating a "marketplace of ideas" that enriches policymaking and enhances governance. Such discourse, as a reflection of free expression, helps prevent democratic stagnation and highlights the coexistence of diverse perspectives, interests and ideologies.

Second, the emergence of a supermajority in the legislature, potentially with the PDI-P joining the ruling coalition sooner or later, raises the risk of misusing fast-track legislative procedures. This process accelerates bills’ approval by imposing tight deadlines and restricting room for debate and revision (Davis, 2015).

The practice can lead to legislative abuse, commonly referred to as abusive lawmaking. Therefore, fast-tracking laws with the support of a supermajority clearly disregards Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/2023, which stresses the importance of allowing meaningful public participation in the legislative process.