TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
New geopolitical order: China’s world or Europe’s?
Unless Europe launches an effort to adopt the alliance structure that the United States has now abandoned, it will find itself in a world made safe for autocracy.
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
A man holds an EU flag during a pro-Europe rally in Bucharest on March 15, 2025. (AFP/Daniel Mihailescu)
“Today we’re in one era, and tomorrow we’ll be in a different era,” United States President Donald Trump loudly proclaimed from the White House Rose Garden as he hiked US tariffs to their highest level since 1909. “No one’s done anything quite like this!”
Not true.
On Oct. 1, 1949, Chairman Mao Zedong stood atop the Tiananmen, the entrance gate of Beijing’s Forbidden City, and declared China’s own “liberation day.” The Communist Party of China (CPC) thenceforth divided the 20th century into two eras: “before liberation”, under Chiang Kai-shek, and “after liberation”, under Mao, who threw China into three decades of political and economic chaos.
Now Trump’s “Liberation Day” promises similar tumult and disruption, but on a global scale.
For Europeans, in particular, it is as if the sun had suddenly burned out: the geopolitical system has lost its coherence and predictability as planets begin careening from their orbits.
Once reliant on the US, even as they sometimes looked down on its crudeness and naivete, Europeans now find themselves on their own, without gravity and forced to confront an American leader who is the ne plus ultra of baseness and ignorance.
Now that the old geopolitical order has been canceled, China and Russia are ready to step into the vacuum and create their version of order. But one is a deracinated Marxist-Leninist regime with lots of military hardware, geography and natural resources, but an economy smaller than Canada’s, and the other is a rejuvenated Leninist one-party state with a massive economy, a thin-skinned leader and a vibrant global tech hub.
