TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search results
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsUK defends new online safety law after X criticism
Under the law, which took effect on July 25, online platforms must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography.
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
The logo for social media network X, formerly Twitter, is pictured displayed on a screen in the stands during the English FA Cup fifth round soccermatch between Aston Villa and Cardiff City at Villa Park in Birmingham, central England on Feb. 28, 2025. (AFP/Oli Scarff)
T
he UK government on Saturday defended a new online safety law following harsh criticism from social network X, saying it was "demonstrably false" that it "compromises free speech".
Under the law, which took effect on July 25, online platforms must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography.
But X said Friday that "the act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach.
"Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer," added the platform, formerly known as Twitter, saying regulators had taken a "heavy-handed approach".
"When lawmakers approved these measures, they made a conscientious decision to increase censorship in the name of 'online safety'," added the platform, owned by billionaire Elon Musk.
The government countered that it was "demonstrably false that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech.
"As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression," said a spokesperson.
The law "does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the most serious risks to children such as pornography or suicide and self-harm content," said the government, adding "platforms have had several months to prepare".
In the event of non-compliance, platforms are liable to fines of up to 18 million poundsterling (US$24 million), or 10 percent of their global turnover, whichever is higher.
