The second case concerns a prolonged contractual issue. The government wants to change the contract of work into a special mining license through which the government wants the company to divest 51 percent of its shares, to which Freeport objects.

The cases share one obvious, but often neglected issue — inequality for the indigenous Papuans. Corruption has been highly pervasive in Indonesia, particularly in Papua.

For years, local aspirations are too easily branded as political ideas about the independence movement. Neglect of the two current cases would bring two consequences.

First, the relative neglect of the grassroots voice will result in more deep grievances toward the local and national governments, as well as multinational companies in Papua.

Corruption involving officials and politicians generates popular belief among Papuans that those elites are oblivious of the grassroots’ misery.

Since 2012, some regents and local politicians in Papua have been involved in abuse of public expenditures. In 2013, the regent of Sarmi was involved in a corruption case related to the use of the local budget to renovate his house. Reports in 2014 highlighted alleged misuse of Rp 22 billion of the local budget for personal interest by 44 West Papua provincial legislative council members.

Popular

Java airports grounded by low demand, poor planning

Bansos recipients found to be on list of online gamblers

‘Beyond the Plate Vol. 2’: Borderless culinary creativity