TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

A voice missing from the education debate

Public-private partnerships in the education sector bring with it skepticism, suspicion and fear. 

Jaspal Sidhu (The Jakarta Post)
Premium
Jakarta
Wed, April 5, 2017

Share This Article

Change Size

A voice missing from the education debate Illustration for a classroom (Shutterstock/File)

F

rom   March 21-23, the World Bank held an education conference in Jakarta entitled “Learning for All: Shared principles for equitable and excellent basic education systems.” Supporting this conference was the education ministry and the Australian government.

A line in the invitation said this would be a great opportunity to “facilitate new networks and partnerships”. Indeed it was. I met World Bank officials, think-tank executives, policy makers and government officials (past and present) from all over the world. From Singapore, Mongolia, China, India, Indonesia to Peru and beyond. I saw statistics after statistics being presented: why early childhood initiatives are important, how much Indonesia has increased in their allocation of operational grants to schools, government initiatives,  examination of PISA results and much more.   

But I recall the invitation also said that this would be an opportunity to “share lessons from best practices and excellent systems.”  Sadly to say besides the insight provided by Peru’s former education minister Jaime Saavedra on how Peru improved its systems, there was little “sharing of best practices”.

Saavedra had so much to share and there were so many questions from the floor, that he went well beyond the time set for his session.  The fact is, the audience wanted to hear more practical ideas and see less statistics.

Ideas of best practices, as we all know, often exist in the more nimble private sector.  Unfortunately, there was no representation from this sector. I may have been the only one there, given the many ideas I shared openly in the interactive sessions. I had several senior government officials from as far away as Brazil and India subsequently exchanging ideas with me. In fact one even replied, “I never thought of that,” when I shared what some private schools do as far as teacher quality is concerned.

Public-private partnerships in the education sector bring with it skepticism, suspicion and fear. 

Skepticism largely comes from thoughts that “educating people” is far more complicated in the public sector than in the private. So the ideas from the latter are often inapplicable, so they need to be left out in such meetings. Suspicion because government officials often think that in a public-private partnership the formula is one of “win-winner”. That no private player will want to genuinely partner the public sector unless it can make some money out of it. Fear because someone in the public sector may lose his/her job for trying something new. Or not be recognized for trying to swim against the tide.

to Read Full Story

  • Unlimited access to our web and app content
  • e-Post daily digital newspaper
  • No advertisements, no interruptions
  • Privileged access to our events and programs
  • Subscription to our newsletters
or

Purchase access to this article for

We accept

TJP - Visa
TJP - Mastercard
TJP - GoPay

Redirecting you to payment page

Pay per article

A voice missing from the education debate

Rp 29,000 / article

1
Create your free account
By proceeding, you consent to the revised Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.
Already have an account?

2
  • Palmerat Barat No. 142-143
  • Central Jakarta
  • DKI Jakarta
  • Indonesia
  • 10270
  • +6283816779933
2
Total Rp 29,000

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.